The owners of the ship or vessel “TINTOMARA” (IMO 9234599) of the port of Monrovia, Liberia v. The owners of the ship or vessel “PHUONG DONG STAR” (IMO number 9404572) of the port of Saigon, Vietnam
The Master found the plaintiffs acted reasonably in selecting and accepting Odessos' urgent repair quotation given the narrow repair window and lack of commercial leverage, and on the evidence allowed full recovery of the Odessos repair costs and ancillary expenses (crew overtime, superintendent attendance for 11...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 3849
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Owners of TINTOMARA (vessel IMO 9234599); Defendants: Owners of PHUONG DONG STAR (vessel IMO 9404572)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 December 2021
- Case Number
- HCAJ34/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty Action in Rem Collision Damage Assessment / Assessment of Damages Before Master Following Referral by Order Dated 15 July 2020
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claims allowed in specified amounts: EUR172,064 and USD171,720.40; interest at judgment rate from date of judgment; costs to follow the event with an order nisi for costs of assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Collision Damages, Reasonableness of Repair Decisions and Mitigation, Off Hire and Deviation Calculations, Recovery of Ancillary Costs (crew Overtime, Superintendent, Paint, Water, Chemicals), Evidence Sufficiency and Proof of Payment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Owners of TINTOMARA (vessel IMO 9234599)
Plaintiffs
Owners of PHUONG DONG STAR (vessel IMO 9404572)
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Admiralty Action in Rem Collision Damage Assessment / Assessment of Damages Before Master Following Referral by Order Dated 15 July 2020
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether repair costs charged by Odessos were reasonable and recoverable
- 2 Whether plaintiffs were obliged to put repairs out to tender or obtain alternative quotations
- 3 Whether various ancillary expenses (crew overtime, superintendent attendance, paint, fresh water, chemicals) were collision-related and recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
The Master found the plaintiffs acted reasonably in selecting and accepting Odessos' urgent repair quotation given the narrow repair window and lack of commercial leverage, and on the evidence allowed full recovery of the Odessos repair costs and ancillary expenses (crew overtime, superintendent attendance for 11 days at US$1,500/day, primer/sealer paint, fresh water, chemicals), accepted agreed fuel and lubricant calculations and awarded off-hire for deviation and repair from 14 to 20 February 2020 (6.1333 days) plus deviation; defendants failed to adduce sufficient contrary evidence to displace plaintiffs' evidence of reasonableness and causation.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claims allowed in specified amounts: EUR172,064 and USD171,720.40; interest at judgment rate from date of judgment; costs to follow the event with an order nisi for costs of assessment.
Orders
- Judgment for plaintiffs in the sums of EUR172,064 and USD171,720.40
- Interest on those sums at the judgment rate from date of judgment until payment in full
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment