FAN CHUN KEUNG v. THE SECRETARY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND WORKS
The Tribunal found the existing use to be a container vehicle park, concluded there were suitable sale comparables so the direct sale comparison method must be used rather than the investment approach, adjusted five nearby sale comparables to derive an adopted unit market value of $1,750 per sq.m., applied that unit rate to the resumed area of 3,835 sq.m. to get $6,711,250 and assessed severance diminution on 2,412.8 sq.m. at 30% of that unit rate ($525/sq.m.) giving $1,266,720, and ordered total compensation of $7,980,000 (rounded).
- Citation
- FAN CHUN KEUNG v. THE SECRETARY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND WORKS
- Parties
- Applicant (registered Owner): Fan Chun Keung; Respondent (government): The Secretary for the Environment, Transport and Works
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2005
- Case Number
- LDMR5/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Reference Application No.5 of 2004 (compensation Under Roads (works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance, Cap.370) / Judgment on Determination of Compensation (professional Fees, Interest and Costs Adjourned)
- Outcome
- Respondent ordered to pay Applicant compensation of $7,980,000 for resumed land and severance; professional fees, interest and costs adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Compensation, Severance Loss, Valuation Methodology (direct Sale Comparison Vs Investment Approach), Existing Use / Melhado Issue, Interpretation and Application of Section 12(aa) LRO
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fan Chun Keung
Applicant (registered Owner)
The Secretary for the Environment, Transport and Works
Respondent (government)
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Reference Application No.5 of 2004 (compensation Under Roads (works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance, Cap.370) / Judgment on Determination of Compensation (professional Fees, Interest and Costs Adjourned)
Legal Issues
- 1 What was the existing use of the resumed land
- 2 Whether to adopt investment (capitalisation of rent) approach or direct sale comparison for valuation
- 3 Which sale comparables are suitable and what adjustments to apply
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found the existing use to be a container vehicle park, concluded there were suitable sale comparables so the direct sale comparison method must be used rather than the investment approach, adjusted five nearby sale comparables to derive an adopted unit market value of $1,750 per sq.m., applied that unit rate to the resumed area of 3,835 sq.m. to get $6,711,250 and assessed severance diminution on 2,412.8 sq.m. at 30% of that unit rate ($525/sq.m.) giving $1,266,720, and ordered total compensation of $7,980,000 (rounded).
Court Disposition
Respondent ordered to pay Applicant compensation of $7,980,000 for resumed land and severance; professional fees, interest and costs adjourned.
Orders
- Respondent to pay Applicant compensation in the sum of $7,980,000
- Professional fees, interest and costs to be determined on a date to be fixed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment