YAU CHI CHUEN AND ANOTHER v. LAM WAI CHUNG AND ANOTHER
The estate is entitled to recover damages for the deceased's lost years under s.20(1) Cap.23 irrespective of dependants; the court must calculate annual net contribution (gross income less deceased's own living expenses) and apply an appropriate multiplier (10 here) to assess lost years; contributory negligence is to be apportioned (50% each) where both parties are equally to blame; the resulting award under Cap.23 extinguishes any claim under the Fatal Accidents Ordinance.
- Citation
- YAU CHI CHUEN AND ANOTHER v. LAM WAI CHUNG AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff (administrator of the Estate of Tsang Mei): YAU CHI CHUEN; Plaintiff (administrator of the Estate of Tsang Mei): YAU YUK MUI; Deceased: TSANG MEI; 1st Defendant: LAM WAI CHUNG; 2nd Defendant: YUEN HING CHEONG METAL FACTORY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 1981
- Case Number
- HCA1910/1980
- Procedural Posture
- Fatal Accident Wrongful Death/personal Injury (vehicle Collision) / Judgment (high Court Trial Concluded)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs (estate). Deceased and 1st defendant found equally to blame (50% apportionment). Damages awarded to the estate under the Law Amendment and Reform (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap.23). Claim under the Fatal Accidents Ordinance extinguished. Costs to plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Lost Years, Contributory Negligence and Apportionment, Interest on Damages, Extinguishment of Fatal Accidents Claim
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YAU CHI CHUEN
Plaintiff (administrator of the Estate of Tsang Mei)
YAU YUK MUI
Plaintiff (administrator of the Estate of Tsang Mei)
TSANG MEI
Deceased
LAM WAI CHUNG
1st Defendant
YUEN HING CHEONG METAL FACTORY LIMITED
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Fatal Accident Wrongful Death/personal Injury (vehicle Collision) / Judgment (high Court Trial Concluded)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st defendant was negligent and liable for death of deceased
- 2 Whether the deceased was contributorily negligent and appropriate apportionment
- 3 Whether the estate can recover damages for 'lost years' under Cap.23 irrespective of dependants
Ratio Decidendi
The estate is entitled to recover damages for the deceased's lost years under s.20(1) Cap.23 irrespective of dependants; the court must calculate annual net contribution (gross income less deceased's own living expenses) and apply an appropriate multiplier (10 here) to assess lost years; contributory negligence is to be apportioned (50% each) where both parties are equally to blame; the resulting award under Cap.23 extinguishes any claim under the Fatal Accidents Ordinance.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs (estate). Deceased and 1st defendant found equally to blame (50% apportionment). Damages awarded to the estate under the Law Amendment and Reform (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap.23). Claim under the Fatal Accidents Ordinance extinguished. Costs to plaintiffs.
Orders
- Judgment for the plaintiffs for damages under Cap.23: $7,500 general damages for loss of expectation of life
- $104,000 general damages for loss of earnings during the 'lost years'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment