AMIANTIT YACOAT CO AND ANOTHER v. KINGS OCEAN SHIPPING CO LTD AND OTHERS
The Master accepted the plaintiffs' uncontested surveyor reports and evidence, awarded damages of US$304,944.17, held that limitation under the Hague-Visby Rules and the bill of lading did not reduce the claim because the claim did not exceed those limits, awarded interest at 8% per annum from the date of writ until judgment and thereafter at the judgment rate, and ordered the 2nd defendant to pay assessed costs of HK$110,000.
- Citation
- AMIANTIT YACOAT CO AND ANOTHER v. KINGS OCEAN SHIPPING CO LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Amiantit Yacoat Company; 2nd Plaintiff: Saudi Arabian Cooperative Insurance Company; 1st Defendant: Kings Ocean Shipping Company Limited; 2nd Defendant: Hua Dao Shipping (Far East) Limited; 3rd Defendant: Tianjin Reda International Shipping Agency Company Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2015
- Case Number
- HCAJ21/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty Action Carriage of Goods by Sea / Assessment of Damages Following Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Assessment award made in favour of the plaintiffs against the 2nd defendant
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Limitation of Liability Under Hague Visby Rules, Bill of Lading Terms, Salvage and Deductible, Interest and Costs Assessment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amiantit Yacoat Company
1st Plaintiff
Saudi Arabian Cooperative Insurance Company
2nd Plaintiff
Kings Ocean Shipping Company Limited
1st Defendant
Hua Dao Shipping (Far East) Limited
2nd Defendant
Tianjin Reda International Shipping Agency Company Limited
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Admiralty Action Carriage of Goods by Sea / Assessment of Damages Following Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Quantum of damages for damaged cargo
- 2 Applicability of Hague-Visby Rules and bill of lading limitation to reduce claim
- 3 Treatment of uncontested expert/surveyor reports
Ratio Decidendi
The Master accepted the plaintiffs' uncontested surveyor reports and evidence, awarded damages of US$304,944.17, held that limitation under the Hague-Visby Rules and the bill of lading did not reduce the claim because the claim did not exceed those limits, awarded interest at 8% per annum from the date of writ until judgment and thereafter at the judgment rate, and ordered the 2nd defendant to pay assessed costs of HK$110,000.
Court Disposition
Assessment award made in favour of the plaintiffs against the 2nd defendant
Orders
- 2nd defendant to pay the plaintiffs US$304,944.17 as damages
- Interest on US$304,944.17 at 8% per annum from date of writ until judgment and thereafter at judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment