鄭恩澤對梁萬粦所經營的燊輝工程裝修公司及另一人

燊輝工程於僱員補償案件可直接上訴故撤銷其就該案的上訴許可申請；就傷亡賠償（損害賠償）案件，燊輝工程未能在審訊前提交或解釋為何未提交所稱之證據，提出之內容主要屬責任爭議或未符Ladd v Marshall標準，且就評定賠償額並無合理勝訴機會，故駁回上訴許可申請，並就訟費作出暫准命令。

Citation: [2021] HKDC 1561
Parties: Applicant/plaintiff: 鄭恩澤; First Defendant/first Respondent: 燊輝工程裝修公司 (由梁萬粦經營); Second Defendant/second Respondent: 僱員補償援助基金管理局
Court: District Court
Jurisdiction: Hong Kong
Judgment Date: 28 December 2021
Case Number: DCPI1479/2018
Procedural Posture: Consolidated Personal Injury and Employees' Compensation Claims / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Assessment of Damages (interlocutory)
Outcome: 燊輝工程就傷亡賠償案件的上訴許可申請被駁回；就僱員補償案件不需申請上訴許可，可直接向上訴法庭上訴。
Legal Topics: Assessment of Damages, Leave to Appeal, Admission of Fresh Evidence, Costs
Source Language: CH

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

鄭恩澤

Applicant/plaintiff

燊輝工程裝修公司 (由梁萬粦經營)

First Defendant/first Respondent

僱員補償援助基金管理局

Second Defendant/second Respondent

Consolidated Personal Injury and Employees' Compensation Claims / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Assessment of Damages (interlocutory)

1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted in the personal injury (damages assessment) case
2 Whether leave is required for appeal against employees' compensation assessment under Employees' Compensation Ordinance s23
3 Whether fresh evidence not presented at trial should be admitted on appeal (Ladd v Marshall criteria)

燊輝工程就傷亡賠償案件的上訴許可申請被駁回；就僱員補償案件不需申請上訴許可，可直接向上訴法庭上訴。