LAU WING YAN AND OTHERS v. JOINT SILVER LTD (in liquidation) AND OTHERS
The summons to convert the originating summons to a writ (or to permit oral evidence and cross-examination) is refused because the principal contentions are matters of law or do not disclose genuine, substantial disputes of fact central to the OS that require conversion; the Plaintiffs have not met the high threshold to impugn the liquidators' conduct; and allowing conversion would cause disproportionate and prejudicial delay given the age and multiplicity of related proceedings.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 2203
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: LAU WING YAN; 2nd Plaintiff: SUN MIN; 3rd Plaintiff: CHANG DAFA; 4th Plaintiff: PACIFIC BULK SHIPPING (CAYMAN) LIMITED; 1st Defendant: JOINT SILVER LIMITED (in liquidation); 2nd Defendant: PACIFIC BULK LOGISTICS LIMITED; 3rd Defendant: CHAN PUI SZE and MAK HAU YIN (in their capacity as the Joint and Several Liquidators of JOINT SILVER LIMITED)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2025
- Case Number
- HCMP54/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons (companies/liquidation) / Case Management Decision on Summons to Convert OS to Writ (conversion Application Heard)
- Outcome
- Summons to convert refused
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Cause of Action, Undertaking as to Damages, Enforcement of Undertaking, Conversion of Originating Summons to Writ, Cross Examination and Oral Evidence, Duties of Liquidators, Delay and Proportionality in Case Management
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAU WING YAN
1st Plaintiff
SUN MIN
2nd Plaintiff
CHANG DAFA
3rd Plaintiff
PACIFIC BULK SHIPPING (CAYMAN) LIMITED
4th Plaintiff
JOINT SILVER LIMITED (in liquidation)
1st Defendant
PACIFIC BULK LOGISTICS LIMITED
2nd Defendant
CHAN PUI SZE and MAK HAU YIN (in their capacity as the Joint and Several Liquidators of JOINT SILVER LIMITED)
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (companies/liquidation) / Case Management Decision on Summons to Convert OS to Writ (conversion Application Heard)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an undertaking as to damages given to the court constitutes an assignable cause of action
- 2 Whether the purported assignment to the 2nd Defendant is void, invalid or should be set aside
- 3 Whether the joint liquidators acted in breach of duty or in collusion in effecting the assignment
Ratio Decidendi
The summons to convert the originating summons to a writ (or to permit oral evidence and cross-examination) is refused because the principal contentions are matters of law or do not disclose genuine, substantial disputes of fact central to the OS that require conversion; the Plaintiffs have not met the high threshold to impugn the liquidators' conduct; and allowing conversion would cause disproportionate and prejudicial delay given the age and multiplicity of related proceedings.
Court Disposition
Summons to convert refused
Orders
- Summons to convert originating summons to writ dismissed
- Proceedings to continue on the originating summons basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment