RE HONOUR JUDGE LI

RE HONOUR JUDGE LI

Section 13B of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance does not oust the inherent jurisdiction of the District Court (as a superior court for these purposes under s79) to revoke bail and remand a defendant where there has been an attempt to interfere with the administration of justice; accordingly the District Judge's order revoking bail was lawful and the judicial review application is refused.

Citation
RE HONOUR JUDGE LI
Parties
Applicant/defendant: Applicant (detective constable); Respondent/prosecution: The Crown
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
15 November 1984
Case Number
HCA3063/1984
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Originating Motion Challenging District Court Order Revoking Bail; High Court Hearing on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Application refused; District Court order revoking bail affirmed.
Legal Topics
Bail Revocation, Jurisdiction of District Judge Vs Magistrate, Interference With Witnesses, Section 13 B Criminal Procedure Ordinance
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant (detective constable)

Applicant/defendant

The Crown

Respondent/prosecution

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Originating Motion Challenging District Court Order Revoking Bail; High Court Hearing on Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether s13B Criminal Procedure Ordinance requires that a person arrested for breach of bail must be brought before a Magistrate and prevents a District Judge from revoking bail
  2. 2 Whether a District Court judge has inherent jurisdiction to revoke bail to prevent interference with the administration of justice
  3. 3 Whether an implied general bail condition prohibiting interference with witnesses suffices or a specific condition is required

Ratio Decidendi

Section 13B of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance does not oust the inherent jurisdiction of the District Court (as a superior court for these purposes under s79) to revoke bail and remand a defendant where there has been an attempt to interfere with the administration of justice; accordingly the District Judge's order revoking bail was lawful and the judicial review application is refused.

Court Disposition

Application refused; District Court order revoking bail affirmed.

Orders

  • Application dismissed.
  • Order of the District Judge (Judge Li) dated 19 October 1984 revoking bail and remanding the applicant in custody upheld.