RE HONOUR JUDGE LI
Section 13B of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance does not oust the inherent jurisdiction of the District Court (as a superior court for these purposes under s79) to revoke bail and remand a defendant where there has been an attempt to interfere with the administration of justice; accordingly the District Judge's order revoking bail was lawful and the judicial review application is refused.
- Citation
- RE HONOUR JUDGE LI
- Parties
- Applicant/defendant: Applicant (detective constable); Respondent/prosecution: The Crown
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 1984
- Case Number
- HCA3063/1984
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Originating Motion Challenging District Court Order Revoking Bail; High Court Hearing on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application refused; District Court order revoking bail affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Bail Revocation, Jurisdiction of District Judge Vs Magistrate, Interference With Witnesses, Section 13 B Criminal Procedure Ordinance
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant (detective constable)
Applicant/defendant
The Crown
Respondent/prosecution
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Originating Motion Challenging District Court Order Revoking Bail; High Court Hearing on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s13B Criminal Procedure Ordinance requires that a person arrested for breach of bail must be brought before a Magistrate and prevents a District Judge from revoking bail
- 2 Whether a District Court judge has inherent jurisdiction to revoke bail to prevent interference with the administration of justice
- 3 Whether an implied general bail condition prohibiting interference with witnesses suffices or a specific condition is required
Ratio Decidendi
Section 13B of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance does not oust the inherent jurisdiction of the District Court (as a superior court for these purposes under s79) to revoke bail and remand a defendant where there has been an attempt to interfere with the administration of justice; accordingly the District Judge's order revoking bail was lawful and the judicial review application is refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused; District Court order revoking bail affirmed.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Order of the District Judge (Judge Li) dated 19 October 1984 revoking bail and remanding the applicant in custody upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment