CHARLES WILLIAM FARRANCE v. KAILAY ENGINEERING CO (HK) LTD
Because the debt was confirmed by the High Court and Court of Appeal and the debtor's newly raised factual point was not previously run and is disputed by its source, there was no prospect of re-opening the matter and a Bankruptcy Order with costs was granted.
- Citation
- CHARLES WILLIAM FARRANCE v. KAILAY ENGINEERING CO (HK) LTD
- Parties
- Applicant/creditor: CHARLES WILLIAM FARRANCE; Debtor/respondent: KAILAY ENGINEERING CO (HK) LTD.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 August 1999
- Case Number
- HCB826/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Application for Bankruptcy Order — Judgment/decision Granting Order
- Outcome
- Bankruptcy Order granted
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Order, Res Judicata, Re Opening Judgments, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHARLES WILLIAM FARRANCE
Applicant/creditor
KAILAY ENGINEERING CO (HK) LTD.
Debtor/respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Application for Bankruptcy Order — Judgment/decision Granting Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a new issue of fact can be used to re-open a judgment debt
- 2 Whether the debtor's failure to raise the point earlier bars re-opening
- 3 Whether disputed evidence from its own source can justify re-opening
Ratio Decidendi
Because the debt was confirmed by the High Court and Court of Appeal and the debtor's newly raised factual point was not previously run and is disputed by its source, there was no prospect of re-opening the matter and a Bankruptcy Order with costs was granted.
Court Disposition
Bankruptcy Order granted
Orders
- Bankruptcy Order made in the usual terms
- Costs awarded to applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment