Re: WARNE YAN WAI DAVID and EX PARTE: THE LAW SOCIETY OF HONG KONG
Because the statutory demand was validly served (by substituted service in accordance with court order), the costs debt had been taxed at HK$354,607.00, and the debtor failed to file the intended interim application and elected not to oppose the petition, the court was entitled to make a bankruptcy order against the debtor and award costs to the petitioner.
- Citation
- Re: WARNE YAN WAI DAVID and EX PARTE: THE LAW SOCIETY OF HONG KONG
- Parties
- Petitioner: The Law Society of Hong Kong; Debtor: Warne Yan Wai David; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 January 2002
- Case Number
- HCB6374/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceedings / Hearing Judgment (bankruptcy Order Made)
- Outcome
- Bankruptcy order made against the debtor
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Order, Statutory Demand, Substituted Service, Costs Taxation, Interim Order Application
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Law Society of Hong Kong
Petitioner
Warne Yan Wai David
Debtor
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceedings / Hearing Judgment (bankruptcy Order Made)
Legal Issues
- 1 Validity of substituted service
- 2 Failure to comply with statutory demand
- 3 Whether to grant interim order
Ratio Decidendi
Because the statutory demand was validly served (by substituted service in accordance with court order), the costs debt had been taxed at HK$354,607.00, and the debtor failed to file the intended interim application and elected not to oppose the petition, the court was entitled to make a bankruptcy order against the debtor and award costs to the petitioner.
Court Disposition
Bankruptcy order made against the debtor
Orders
- Bankruptcy order made against Warne Yan Wai David
- Costs awarded to the petitioner including all costs reserved on 28 November 2001, 5 December 2001 and 24 December 2001
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment