CANTAB INTERNATIONAL LTD AND OTHERS v. LUK NGAI LING IRENE AND OTHERS
Clause 2(2) required provision of an updated audit report up to the date of the agreement or as near as reasonably practicable; defendants failed to supply such a report, withdrew resignation/nomination letters to the Education Bureau contrary to clause 5 and withheld essential information, these breaches amounted to repudiation; plaintiffs were entitled to terminate and recover the deposit and losses; counterclaim dismissed.
- Citation
- CANTAB INTERNATIONAL LTD AND OTHERS v. LUK NGAI LING IRENE AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Cantab International Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Ng Tsz Man; 3rd Plaintiff: Leung Kin Yan; 1st Defendant: Luk Ngai Ling Irene; 2nd Defendant: Cantab Education Centre (Fo Tan) Limited; 3rd Defendant: Cantab Education Centre (Kowloon Bay) Limited; 4th Defendant: Cantab Education Centre (Prince Edward) Limited; 5th Defendant: Cantab Education Centre Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 1 November 2016
- Case Number
- HCA926/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Contractual Dispute (sale of Tutorial Business) / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs; defendants' counterclaim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Sale of Business as a Going Concern, Repudiation and Rescission, Damages Assessment, Veil of Incorporation, Regulatory Approval (education Bureau)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cantab International Limited
1st Plaintiff
Ng Tsz Man
2nd Plaintiff
Leung Kin Yan
3rd Plaintiff
Luk Ngai Ling Irene
1st Defendant
Cantab Education Centre (Fo Tan) Limited
2nd Defendant
Cantab Education Centre (Kowloon Bay) Limited
3rd Defendant
Cantab Education Centre (Prince Edward) Limited
4th Defendant
Cantab Education Centre Limited
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contractual Dispute (sale of Tutorial Business) / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Meaning and effect of clause 2(2) requiring an "updated Audit Report" before payment of balance
- 2 Whether the defendants' conduct (failure to provide updated report and withdrawal of resignation letters to Education Bureau) amounted to repudiatory breach
- 3 Whether plaintiffs were buying only the 5th defendant company or the business as a going concern
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 2(2) required provision of an updated audit report up to the date of the agreement or as near as reasonably practicable; defendants failed to supply such a report, withdrew resignation/nomination letters to the Education Bureau contrary to clause 5 and withheld essential information, these breaches amounted to repudiation; plaintiffs were entitled to terminate and recover the deposit and losses; counterclaim dismissed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs; defendants' counterclaim dismissed
Orders
- Return of HKD 1,000,000 (first instalment) to the plaintiffs
- Payment of HKD 911,712.24 for rental in respect of April and May 2012
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment