陳 對 鍾
The Court granted leave to appeal limited to the single issue of whether one‑third of the respondent's retirement pension was correctly treated as family asset, and directed procedural steps: service of the notice of appeal within 14 days, filing and listing under High Court Rules Order 59 r5, and permitted the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] HKCA 1733
- Parties
- Applicant (女方): 陳; Respondent (男方): 鍾
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2022
- Case Number
- CAMP419/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against District Court Ancillary Relief Decision (matrimonial) / Application for Leave to Appeal Granted; Directions for Filing and Listing Under High Court Rules Order 59 R5
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted on a single issue; procedural directions given
- Legal Topics
- Calculation of Retirement Pension as Matrimonial Asset, Leave to Appeal, Paper Disposal of Appeal
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
陳
Applicant (女方)
鍾
Respondent (男方)
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against District Court Ancillary Relief Decision (matrimonial) / Application for Leave to Appeal Granted; Directions for Filing and Listing Under High Court Rules Order 59 R5
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the district judge was correct to calculate one‑third of the respondent's retirement pension as part of the family assets for ancillary relief purposes
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted leave to appeal limited to the single issue of whether one‑third of the respondent's retirement pension was correctly treated as family asset, and directed procedural steps: service of the notice of appeal within 14 days, filing and listing under High Court Rules Order 59 r5, and permitted the appeal to be disposed of on written submissions unless the parties notify disagreement within 14 days of service.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted on a single issue; procedural directions given
Orders
- Applicant to serve notice of appeal on respondent and file in court within 14 days of order
- Appeal to be listed pursuant to High Court Rules Order 59 r5
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CAMP 419/2022 [2022] HKCA 1733 香港特別行政區 高等法院 上訴法庭 案件編號:雜項案件 2022 年第419號 (擬上訴的原本案件:區域法院婚姻訴訟2016 年第9689號) 申請人 陳 及 答辯人 鍾 審理法官: 高等法院上訴法庭副庭長朱芬齡 高等法院上訴法庭法官張澤祐 裁決書日期:2022年11月18日 裁決書 上訴法庭法官張澤祐頒發上訴法庭裁決書: 申請人(「女方」)就區域法院法官彭家光2022年7 月2日的附屬濟助判決向上訴法庭申請上訴許可。 本庭命令女方可就該判決的唯一議題,即「彭法官裁定答辯人「男方」的退休金之三分一計算為家庭資產是否正確」獲得上訴許可。女方須於本命令發出後的14 天內將上訴通知書送達男方及存檔法庭,以及根據《高等法院規則》第59 號命令第5 條規則排期上訴。 本庭認為本上訴可不經口頭聆訊,而以書面陳詞形式處理。雙方須在男方接獲上訴通知書後的14 天內以信函通知本庭是否同意上述處理方式。本庭之後會發出進一步指示。 本庭保留本申請訟費的裁決。 (朱芬齡) 高等法院上訴法庭副庭長 (張澤祐) 高等法院上訴法庭法官 申請人:無律師代表, 親自行事。 答辯人:無律師代表, 親自行事。