MAN KING CHUEN AND OTHERS v. HONG LOK YUEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ASSOCIATION LTD AND ANOTHER

MAN KING CHUEN AND OTHERS v. HONG LOK YUEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ASSOCIATION LTD AND ANOTHER

Recorder Yvonne Cheng SC granted the 2nd Defendant leave to adduce expert evidence on the two specified questions of Chinese customary law, holding that expert evidence on Chinese customs remains admissible and may be helpful even where prior authorities exist; further held that the Court of Appeal decisions cited...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] HKCFI 1686
Parties
1st Plaintiff: MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN SUI TSO TSO); 2nd Plaintiff: MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN NIM TSO TSO); 3rd Plaintiff: MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN CHEUNG TSO TSO alias MAN TSEUNG TSO TSO); 4th Plaintiff: MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN WING TSO TSO); 5th Plaintiff: MAN CHIU TAT; MAN CHIU FOOK (suing as Managers of MAN CHIK HUNG TSO alias MAN TSIK HUNG TSO); 6th Plaintiff: MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN WONG SHI TSO); 7th Plaintiff: MAN KAN CHUNG; MAN KING CHUEN; MAN MAY YAN ALBERT; 1st Defendant: HONG LOK YUEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ASSOCIATION LIMITED; 2nd Defendant (in Voluntary Liquidation): HONG LOK YUEN ESTATES LIMITED (in voluntary liquidation)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
21 August 2018
Case Number
HCA299/2011
Procedural Posture
Action (land/property Dispute) / Application for Leave to Adduce Expert Evidence (summons)
Outcome
Summons granted in terms; leave granted to adduce expert evidence on two questions of Chinese customary law; costs order nisi in favour of 2nd Defendant
Legal Topics
Chinese Customary Law, Expert Evidence Admissibility, Adverse Possession, Limitation Ordinance (cap 347), Tso/tong Trusts and Members' Interests
Source Language
en
Land Law Customary Law Evidence Limitation Law Trusts and Equity Chinese Customary Law Expert Evidence Admissibility Adverse Possession +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN SUI TSO TSO)

1st Plaintiff

MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN NIM TSO TSO)

2nd Plaintiff

MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN CHEUNG TSO TSO alias MAN TSEUNG TSO TSO)

3rd Plaintiff

MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN WING TSO TSO)

4th Plaintiff

MAN CHIU TAT; MAN CHIU FOOK (suing as Managers of MAN CHIK HUNG TSO alias MAN TSIK HUNG TSO)

5th Plaintiff

MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN WONG SHI TSO)

6th Plaintiff

MAN KAN CHUNG; MAN KING CHUEN; MAN MAY YAN ALBERT

7th Plaintiff

HONG LOK YUEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ASSOCIATION LIMITED

1st Defendant

HONG LOK YUEN ESTATES LIMITED (in voluntary liquidation)

2nd Defendant (in Voluntary Liquidation)

Procedural Posture

Action (land/property Dispute) / Application for Leave to Adduce Expert Evidence (summons)

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to adduce expert evidence on Chinese customary law where prior authorities exist
  2. 2 Whether a Tso is a trust with managers as trustees and members acquiring life beneficial interests at birth
  3. 3 Whether Court of Appeal decisions in Wong Shing Chau and Tsang Kwong Kuen are binding on the CFI on the propositions in Leung Kuen Fai

Ratio Decidendi

Recorder Yvonne Cheng SC granted the 2nd Defendant leave to adduce expert evidence on the two specified questions of Chinese customary law, holding that expert evidence on Chinese customs remains admissible and may be helpful even where prior authorities exist; further held that the Court of Appeal decisions cited did not constitute binding precedents on the specific propositions in Leung Kuen Fai because they had assumed or applied that decision rather than directly deciding its correctness.

Court Disposition

Summons granted in terms; leave granted to adduce expert evidence on two questions of Chinese customary law; costs order nisi in favour of 2nd Defendant

Orders

  • Order in terms of paragraphs (1) to (3) of the Summons (leave to adduce expert evidence on the two specified questions)
  • Costs of preparation of the parties' expert evidence in accordance with paragraphs (1) to (3) of the Summons to be in the cause