MAN KING CHUEN AND OTHERS v. HONG LOK YUEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ASSOCIATION LTD AND ANOTHER
Recorder Yvonne Cheng SC granted the 2nd Defendant leave to adduce expert evidence on the two specified questions of Chinese customary law, holding that expert evidence on Chinese customs remains admissible and may be helpful even where prior authorities exist; further held that the Court of Appeal decisions cited...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 1686
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN SUI TSO TSO); 2nd Plaintiff: MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN NIM TSO TSO); 3rd Plaintiff: MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN CHEUNG TSO TSO alias MAN TSEUNG TSO TSO); 4th Plaintiff: MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN WING TSO TSO); 5th Plaintiff: MAN CHIU TAT; MAN CHIU FOOK (suing as Managers of MAN CHIK HUNG TSO alias MAN TSIK HUNG TSO); 6th Plaintiff: MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN WONG SHI TSO); 7th Plaintiff: MAN KAN CHUNG; MAN KING CHUEN; MAN MAY YAN ALBERT; 1st Defendant: HONG LOK YUEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ASSOCIATION LIMITED; 2nd Defendant (in Voluntary Liquidation): HONG LOK YUEN ESTATES LIMITED (in voluntary liquidation)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2018
- Case Number
- HCA299/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Action (land/property Dispute) / Application for Leave to Adduce Expert Evidence (summons)
- Outcome
- Summons granted in terms; leave granted to adduce expert evidence on two questions of Chinese customary law; costs order nisi in favour of 2nd Defendant
- Legal Topics
- Chinese Customary Law, Expert Evidence Admissibility, Adverse Possession, Limitation Ordinance (cap 347), Tso/tong Trusts and Members' Interests
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN SUI TSO TSO)
1st Plaintiff
MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN NIM TSO TSO)
2nd Plaintiff
MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN CHEUNG TSO TSO alias MAN TSEUNG TSO TSO)
3rd Plaintiff
MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN WING TSO TSO)
4th Plaintiff
MAN CHIU TAT; MAN CHIU FOOK (suing as Managers of MAN CHIK HUNG TSO alias MAN TSIK HUNG TSO)
5th Plaintiff
MAN KING CHUEN; MAN CHIU FOOK; MAN PAUL SHUIWIND; MAN KAM WING (suing as Managers of MAN WONG SHI TSO)
6th Plaintiff
MAN KAN CHUNG; MAN KING CHUEN; MAN MAY YAN ALBERT
7th Plaintiff
HONG LOK YUEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ASSOCIATION LIMITED
1st Defendant
HONG LOK YUEN ESTATES LIMITED (in voluntary liquidation)
2nd Defendant (in Voluntary Liquidation)
Procedural Posture
Action (land/property Dispute) / Application for Leave to Adduce Expert Evidence (summons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to adduce expert evidence on Chinese customary law where prior authorities exist
- 2 Whether a Tso is a trust with managers as trustees and members acquiring life beneficial interests at birth
- 3 Whether Court of Appeal decisions in Wong Shing Chau and Tsang Kwong Kuen are binding on the CFI on the propositions in Leung Kuen Fai
Ratio Decidendi
Recorder Yvonne Cheng SC granted the 2nd Defendant leave to adduce expert evidence on the two specified questions of Chinese customary law, holding that expert evidence on Chinese customs remains admissible and may be helpful even where prior authorities exist; further held that the Court of Appeal decisions cited did not constitute binding precedents on the specific propositions in Leung Kuen Fai because they had assumed or applied that decision rather than directly deciding its correctness.
Court Disposition
Summons granted in terms; leave granted to adduce expert evidence on two questions of Chinese customary law; costs order nisi in favour of 2nd Defendant
Orders
- Order in terms of paragraphs (1) to (3) of the Summons (leave to adduce expert evidence on the two specified questions)
- Costs of preparation of the parties' expert evidence in accordance with paragraphs (1) to (3) of the Summons to be in the cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment