NINTENDO CO LTD v. LIK SANG INTERNATIONAL LTD AND OTHERS
Summary judgment was proper because on the evidence there was no real prospect of the defendants defeating liability: the Game Boy products were issued in a copy-protected form within s.273, the defendants' Flash products were specifically designed and predominantly used to circumvent that protection, the corporate defendants had no viable defence, the personal defendants were personally liable as active, knowing participants and profited from the infringement, and an interim payment of $5,000,000 was a reasonable conservative minimum of likely recoverable damages.
- Citation
- NINTENDO CO LTD v. LIK SANG INTERNATIONAL LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Nintendo Co. Ltd; 2nd Plaintiff: Nintendo of America Inc; 1st Defendant: Lik Sang International Limited; 2nd Defendant: Visoly Limited; 3rd Defendant: Ahlswede Nils; 4th Defendant: Alexander Peter Kampl
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2003
- Case Number
- HCA3584/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Copyright Infringement / Summary Judgment Application Under Section 273 of the Copyright Ordinance / Summary Judgment Hearing and Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Summary judgment entered for the plaintiffs against all four defendants; interim payment ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Circumvention of Copy Protection, Secondary Liability for Devices Enabling Infringement, Directors' Personal Liability, Interim Payment for Damages
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nintendo Co. Ltd
1st Plaintiff
Nintendo of America Inc
2nd Plaintiff
Lik Sang International Limited
1st Defendant
Visoly Limited
2nd Defendant
Ahlswede Nils
3rd Defendant
Alexander Peter Kampl
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement / Summary Judgment Application Under Section 273 of the Copyright Ordinance / Summary Judgment Hearing and Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs' Game Boy products were issued in a form that is copy-protected within the meaning of s.273(4) of the Copyright Ordinance
- 2 Whether defendants' Flash Linker/Flash Card devices were devices or means specifically designed or adapted to circumvent copy-protection under s.273(2)(a)
- 3 Whether the corporate defendants (1st and 2nd) have an arguable defence to liability under s.273
Ratio Decidendi
Summary judgment was proper because on the evidence there was no real prospect of the defendants defeating liability: the Game Boy products were issued in a copy-protected form within s.273, the defendants' Flash products were specifically designed and predominantly used to circumvent that protection, the corporate defendants had no viable defence, the personal defendants were personally liable as active, knowing participants and profited from the infringement, and an interim payment of $5,000,000 was a reasonable conservative minimum of likely recoverable damages.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment entered for the plaintiffs against all four defendants; interim payment ordered.
Orders
- Summary judgment entered in favour of the plaintiffs against the 1st to 4th defendants
- Interim payment of 5,000,000 (court referred to $5,000,000 as a conservative minimum)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment