CHEN TEK YEE AND OTHERS v. CHAN MOON SHING AND ANOTHER
The court found on the facts that the deceased repeatedly promised Chen and her daughters a permanent home and their expenditure and occupation constituted detrimental reliance on that contractual licence; those assurances and conduct gave rise to a constructive trust protecting life sole and exclusive occupation of the Property in favour of Chen, Lin and Wendy and that Chan and Ng, having notice and having purchased at a reduced price, were bound by that trust; accordingly the declaration of life occupation was granted while the claim that Chen was beneficial owner of the 50% share was dismissed.
- Citation
- CHEN TEK YEE AND OTHERS v. CHAN MOON SHING AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Chen Tek Yee; 2nd Plaintiff: Liang Lin Lin; 3rd Plaintiff: Leung Wai Wendy; 1st Defendant: Chan Moon Shing; 2nd Defendant: Ng Goon Lau, Joseph
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2015
- Case Number
- HCA954/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Property/constructive Trust / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Declaration granted that the plaintiffs (Chen, Lin, Wendy) are entitled to sole and exclusive occupation of the Property during their respective lifetimes; plaintiffs' claim to be beneficial owner of the 50% share dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Common Intention Constructive Trust, Contractual Licence, Constructive Trust, Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice, Life Occupation/occupation Rights
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chen Tek Yee
1st Plaintiff
Liang Lin Lin
2nd Plaintiff
Leung Wai Wendy
3rd Plaintiff
Chan Moon Shing
1st Defendant
Ng Goon Lau, Joseph
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Property/constructive Trust / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a common intention constructive trust existed over the 50% share in favour of the applicant
- 2 Whether the contractual licence and assurances given by the deceased gave rise to a constructive trust enforcing life occupation rights for the plaintiffs
- 3 Whether the assignees (Chan and Ng) took free of any equitable interest or were bound by the trust/encumbrance
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the facts that the deceased repeatedly promised Chen and her daughters a permanent home and their expenditure and occupation constituted detrimental reliance on that contractual licence; those assurances and conduct gave rise to a constructive trust protecting life sole and exclusive occupation of the Property in favour of Chen, Lin and Wendy and that Chan and Ng, having notice and having purchased at a reduced price, were bound by that trust; accordingly the declaration of life occupation was granted while the claim that Chen was beneficial owner of the 50% share was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted that the plaintiffs (Chen, Lin, Wendy) are entitled to sole and exclusive occupation of the Property during their respective lifetimes; plaintiffs' claim to be beneficial owner of the 50% share dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that the 1st, 2nd and 3rd plaintiffs are entitled to sole and exclusive occupation of the Property during each of their respective lifetimes for so long as each wishes to continue to occupy the Property to the exclusion of Chan, Ng and their successors-in-title
- Costs order nisi that Ng shall pay plaintiffs half their costs of the action in respect of their claim (excluding costs of the counterclaim), to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment