RE CONCORD UNITED LTD (IN CREDITORS VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION)
The court granted the 12‑month deferral to 19 November 2005 because the applicants undertook to meet the liquidator's fees and all legal costs of defending the mortgage action, the liquidator confirmed agreement to fees, the mortgage plaintiff had not actively prosecuted the action, and there was no appearance that any creditor's interests would be prejudiced; the order must be registered under s.248(5).
- Citation
- RE CONCORD UNITED LTD (IN CREDITORS VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION)
- Parties
- Applicant (shareholder and Director): Ho Fung Yuen; Applicant (shareholder and Director): Lam Hak Sing; Company (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation): Concord United Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation); Liquidator (supports Deferral and Confirmed Fees): Liquidator of Concord United Limited; Respondent (plaintiff in Mortgage Action HCMP No.1944/2003): Wing Hang Bank Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2004
- Case Number
- HCMP2927/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 248(4) Companies Ordinance to Defer Dissolution / Chambers Hearing and Decision on Originating Summons
- Outcome
- Application granted. Dissolution deferred for 12 months to 19 November 2005.
- Legal Topics
- Company Dissolution, Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation, Extension/deferral of Dissolution, Mortgage Litigation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ho Fung Yuen
Applicant (shareholder and Director)
Lam Hak Sing
Applicant (shareholder and Director)
Concord United Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation)
Company (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)
Liquidator of Concord United Limited
Liquidator (supports Deferral and Confirmed Fees)
Wing Hang Bank Limited
Respondent (plaintiff in Mortgage Action HCMP No.1944/2003)
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 248(4) Companies Ordinance to Defer Dissolution / Chambers Hearing and Decision on Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should defer the date of dissolution under s.248(4) of the Companies Ordinance
- 2 Whether any creditor's interests would be prejudiced by the deferral
- 3 Whether applicants have satisfactorily undertaken to meet liquidator's fees and legal costs in contesting related litigation
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted the 12‑month deferral to 19 November 2005 because the applicants undertook to meet the liquidator's fees and all legal costs of defending the mortgage action, the liquidator confirmed agreement to fees, the mortgage plaintiff had not actively prosecuted the action, and there was no appearance that any creditor's interests would be prejudiced; the order must be registered under s.248(5).
Court Disposition
Application granted. Dissolution deferred for 12 months to 19 November 2005.
Orders
- Dissolution of Concord United Limited deferred to 19 November 2005 pursuant to section 248(4) Companies Ordinance
- Applicants to deliver to the Registrar of Companies, within 7 days, an office copy of the order for registration pursuant to section 248(5)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment