香港特別行政區 訴 森林物業服務有限公司

香港特別行政區 訴 森林物業服務有限公司

申請被拒絕的理由為：申請人主要提出的係事實性爭議與誠信評估，及已受既定判例拘束的法律點，並不構成第32條所要求的重大而廣泛重要性的法律觀點，因此不應簽署向終審法院上訴之證明。

Source-derived case information.

Citation
香港特別行政區 訴 森林物業服務有限公司
Parties
答辯人: 香港特別行政區; 申請人: 森林物業服務有限公司
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
2 April 2014
Case Number
HCMA762/2013
Procedural Posture
刑事上訴／第32條就終審法院上訴許可之申請 / 申請證明（post‑conviction Application for Certificate Under S32）
Outcome
拒絕根據終審法院條例第32條簽署上訴許可之證明
Legal Topics
Compliance With Statutory Building Orders, Offence of Non‑compliance With Buildings Department Order, Leave to Appeal Under S32 Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Assessment of Factual Findings and Witness Credibility, Enforcement Discretion/tolerance Policy
Source Language
ch
Criminal Law Administrative Law Appellate Procedure Compliance With Statutory Building Orders Offence of Non‑compliance With Buildings Department Order Leave to Appeal Under S32 Court of Final Appeal Ordinance Assessment of Factual Findings and Witness Credibility Enforcement Discretion/tolerance Policy

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

香港特別行政區

答辯人

森林物業服務有限公司

申請人

Procedural Posture

刑事上訴／第32條就終審法院上訴許可之申請 / 申請證明（post‑conviction Application for Certificate Under S32）

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the case raises a point of law of great and general importance under s32
  2. 2 Whether the appellant complied with the Buildings Department order to install an automatic self‑closing device on a wooden door
  3. 3 Whether challenges to the Buildings Department's order in a criminal trial raise unsettled legal issues

Ratio Decidendi

申請被拒絕的理由為：申請人主要提出的係事實性爭議與誠信評估，及已受既定判例拘束的法律點，並不構成第32條所要求的重大而廣泛重要性的法律觀點，因此不應簽署向終審法院上訴之證明。

Court Disposition

拒絕根據終審法院條例第32條簽署上訴許可之證明

Orders

  • 申請簽署第32條證明被拒絕