FULLY HK INVESTMENTS LTD AND OTHERS v. POON VAI CHING, THE EXECUTRIX OF THE WILL OF POON KAM CHUEN (DECEASED) AND OTHERS
The court refused leave to appeal out of time because the eight day delay was inexcusable and, given that, the second respondent failed to demonstrate a real prospect of success; the Lands Tribunal correctly applied Capital Well in holding it need not perform a valuation of special purchaser/marriage value at the section 4(2)(b) stage because such matters are to be resolved by the public auction.
- Citation
- FULLY HK INVESTMENTS LTD AND OTHERS v. POON VAI CHING, THE EXECUTRIX OF THE WILL OF POON KAM CHUEN (DECEASED) AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: FULLY H.K. INVESTMENTS LIMITED; 2nd Applicant: SHARP DRAGON INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LIMITED; 3rd Applicant: CHEONG WING HOLDINGS LIMITED; 1st Respondent: POON VAI CHING, THE EXECUTRIX OF THE WILL OF POON KAM CHUEN (DECEASED); 2nd Respondent: POON YIU CHUNG EUGENE; 3rd Respondent: POON MING TAK; 4th Respondent: POON MING KING; 5th Respondent: POON KAI CHUNG KEVIN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 April 2007
- Case Number
- HCMP591/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Intended Appeal From Land Compulsory Sale Application (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and for Stay of Execution (refused)
- Outcome
- Applications refused: leave to appeal out of time denied and application for stay of execution refused.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Sale, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Valuation at Auction, Special Purchaser / Marriage Value, Plot Ratio Impact
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FULLY H.K. INVESTMENTS LIMITED
1st Applicant
SHARP DRAGON INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LIMITED
2nd Applicant
CHEONG WING HOLDINGS LIMITED
3rd Applicant
POON VAI CHING, THE EXECUTRIX OF THE WILL OF POON KAM CHUEN (DECEASED)
1st Respondent
POON YIU CHUNG EUGENE
2nd Respondent
POON MING TAK
3rd Respondent
POON MING KING
4th Respondent
POON KAI CHUNG KEVIN
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Intended Appeal From Land Compulsory Sale Application (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and for Stay of Execution (refused)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the eight day delay in seeking leave to appeal out of time was excusable
- 2 Whether the second respondent demonstrated a real prospect of success on the merits
- 3 Whether the Lands Tribunal was required to value special purchaser/marriage value (plot ratio 9) when assessing fairness under section 4(2)(b)
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused leave to appeal out of time because the eight day delay was inexcusable and, given that, the second respondent failed to demonstrate a real prospect of success; the Lands Tribunal correctly applied Capital Well in holding it need not perform a valuation of special purchaser/marriage value at the section 4(2)(b) stage because such matters are to be resolved by the public auction.
Court Disposition
Applications refused: leave to appeal out of time denied and application for stay of execution refused.
Orders
- Summons for leave to appeal out of time dismissed
- Application for stay of execution dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment