SILVER WISDOM INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER v. YEUNG HIN KAN AND TAM SAU WAH AND ANOTHER
The Tribunal found the applicants met the statutory ownership threshold, accepted expert evidence that the Building is aged, functionally obsolete and in very poor/unsafe repair making redevelopment justified, found the applicants made multiple offers that a reputable valuer (Savills) supported and thus were reasonable steps to acquire the remaining share, accepted the residual valuation for redevelopment (RDV) and therefore ordered compulsory sale by public auction with reserve price set at HK$207,300,000 and ancillary directions including appointment of trustees and completion timeframe.
- Citation
- SILVER WISDOM INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER v. YEUNG HIN KAN AND TAM SAU WAH AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: Silver Wisdom Investments Limited; 2nd Applicant: Glory Step Investments Limited; 1st Respondent: Yeung Hin Kan and Tam Sau Wah; 2nd Respondent (discontinued): Chan Kwok Lam and Tam Shiu Mui
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2013
- Case Number
- LDCS7000/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Application / Judgment (lands Tribunal)
- Outcome
- Order for sale granted: compulsory sale of all undivided shares in the Lot for purposes of redevelopment; reserve price set; trustees appointed; sale by public auction ordered; liberty to apply for further directions; costs order nisi (no order as to costs)
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Sale, Redevelopment Justification, Existing Use Value (euv) Determination, Reserve Price / Redevelopment Value (rdv), Reasonable Steps to Acquire Minority Shares
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silver Wisdom Investments Limited
1st Applicant
Glory Step Investments Limited
2nd Applicant
Yeung Hin Kan and Tam Sau Wah
1st Respondent
Chan Kwok Lam and Tam Shiu Mui
2nd Respondent (discontinued)
Procedural Posture
Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Application / Judgment (lands Tribunal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants satisfied the s.3 ownership threshold (90%) to bring the application
- 2 Whether redevelopment is justified by age or state of repair under s.4(2)(a)
- 3 Whether the applicants took reasonable steps to acquire all undivided shares under s.4(2)(b)
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found the applicants met the statutory ownership threshold, accepted expert evidence that the Building is aged, functionally obsolete and in very poor/unsafe repair making redevelopment justified, found the applicants made multiple offers that a reputable valuer (Savills) supported and thus were reasonable steps to acquire the remaining share, accepted the residual valuation for redevelopment (RDV) and therefore ordered compulsory sale by public auction with reserve price set at HK$207,300,000 and ancillary directions including appointment of trustees and completion timeframe.
Court Disposition
Order for sale granted: compulsory sale of all undivided shares in the Lot for purposes of redevelopment; reserve price set; trustees appointed; sale by public auction ordered; liberty to apply for further directions; costs order nisi (no order as to costs)
Orders
- Tribunal satisfied value of 1st respondent's unit as assessed is fair and reasonable and comparable with applicants' units
- Tribunal satisfied redevelopment of the Lot is justified due to age and state of repair and that applicants took reasonable steps to acquire all undivided shares
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment