GILMERTON LTD AND OTHERS v. POLYWIN HOLDINGS LTD AND OTHERS
The Tribunal found on the evidence that the three staircases physically and contractually connect the four buildings and are intended for common use, thereby making s.3(2)(b) applicable and yielding an aggregate majority interest of 93.125%; expert evidence established the buildings and retaining wall are in a state of disrepair and pose danger, satisfying s.4(2)(a); valuation annexed to the application complied with the Ordinance and no variation was required; accordingly an order for compulsory sale for redevelopment was justified and made.
- Citation
- GILMERTON LTD AND OTHERS v. POLYWIN HOLDINGS LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: Gilmerton Limited; 2nd Applicant: Wah Shun Enterprises Limited; 3rd Applicant: Power Speed Limited; 4th Applicant: Amberlite Assets Limited; 5th Applicant: Egremont Estates Limited; 6th Applicant: Central Business Resources Limited; 7th Applicant: Multispeed Company Limited; 8th Applicant: Hang Cheong Fat Limited; 9th Applicant: Continental Investment Enterprises Limited; 10th Applicant: China-Invest-Plus Limited; 11th Applicant: International Trader Limited; 12th Applicant: Adventure City Limited; 1st Respondent: Polywin Holdings Limited; 2nd Respondent: Lo Sai Ip; 3rd Respondent: Shum Wah Ki
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2005
- Case Number
- LDCS2000/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Application / Judgment (lands Tribunal)
- Outcome
- Order for compulsory sale granted for all undivided shares in the four lots for redevelopment
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment, Eligibility Under S.3, Redevelopment Justification Under S.4, Valuation and Apportionment, Trustees Appointment, Dangerous Hillside/retaining Wall
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gilmerton Limited
1st Applicant
Wah Shun Enterprises Limited
2nd Applicant
Power Speed Limited
3rd Applicant
Amberlite Assets Limited
4th Applicant
Egremont Estates Limited
5th Applicant
Central Business Resources Limited
6th Applicant
Multispeed Company Limited
7th Applicant
Hang Cheong Fat Limited
8th Applicant
Continental Investment Enterprises Limited
9th Applicant
China-Invest-Plus Limited
10th Applicant
International Trader Limited
11th Applicant
Adventure City Limited
12th Applicant
Polywin Holdings Limited
1st Respondent
Lo Sai Ip
2nd Respondent
Shum Wah Ki
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Application / Judgment (lands Tribunal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants satisfied s.3 ownership threshold for multi-lot application
- 2 Whether buildings are connected by staircases intended for common use (s.3(2)(b))
- 3 Whether redevelopment is justified by age or state of repair (s.4(2)(a))
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found on the evidence that the three staircases physically and contractually connect the four buildings and are intended for common use, thereby making s.3(2)(b) applicable and yielding an aggregate majority interest of 93.125%; expert evidence established the buildings and retaining wall are in a state of disrepair and pose danger, satisfying s.4(2)(a); valuation annexed to the application complied with the Ordinance and no variation was required; accordingly an order for compulsory sale for redevelopment was justified and made.
Court Disposition
Order for compulsory sale granted for all undivided shares in the four lots for redevelopment
Orders
- Order that all the undivided shares in Nos.4,4A,6 and 6A of Castle Steps (four lots) be sold for redevelopment
- Appointment of Mr. Ma Ho Fai and Ms. Tsang May Ping (partners of Woo, Kwan, Lee and Lo) as trustees under s.4(1)(c)(i)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment