CHAMPION SUCCESS LTD AND ANOTHER v. SOMCHIT SERTTHIN AND OTHERS
The Tribunal held that Applicants met the statutory ownership threshold (85.42% ≥ 80% under s.3(5)), redevelopment was justified on grounds of age and poor state of repair based on expert structural and condition evidence and high repair costs, Applicants took reasonable steps to acquire the minority share (offers and settlement within fair range), proceeds to be apportioned by EUV, and the redevelopment (residual) valuation of $77,000,000 is an appropriate reserve price; accordingly an order for sale by public auction was granted with specified trustees and conditions.
- Citation
- CHAMPION SUCCESS LTD AND ANOTHER v. SOMCHIT SERTTHIN AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: Champion Success Limited (創意昇有限公司); 2nd Applicant: All Bright Hong Kong Investment Limited (恒輝香港投資有限公司); 1st Respondent: Somchit Sertthin and Somboon Sertthin; 2nd Respondent: Wing Cheung Machinery Company Limited; 3rd Respondent: Yip Cheong Ming (appointed to represent the estate of Lo Yuet Kiu, deceased)
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2012
- Case Number
- LDCS40000/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Land Compulsory Sale Application No. 40000 of 2011 / Judgment (29 June 2012)
- Outcome
- Order for sale granted in favour of the Applicants under the Land (Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Cap.545
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment, Threshold Ownership Percentage Under S.3 and S.3(5) Cap.545, Justification for Redevelopment: Age and State of Repair, Reasonable Steps to Acquire Minority Shares, Valuation: EUV and RDV, Reserve Price Determination, Apportionment of Proceeds Under Schedule 1
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Champion Success Limited (創意昇有限公司)
1st Applicant
All Bright Hong Kong Investment Limited (恒輝香港投資有限公司)
2nd Applicant
Somchit Sertthin and Somboon Sertthin
1st Respondent
Wing Cheung Machinery Company Limited
2nd Respondent
Yip Cheong Ming (appointed to represent the estate of Lo Yuet Kiu, deceased)
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Compulsory Sale Application No. 40000 of 2011 / Judgment (29 June 2012)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Applicants met statutory ownership threshold to apply under s.3 of the Ordinance
- 2 Whether redevelopment is justified on grounds of age and/or state of repair under s.4(2)(a)
- 3 Whether Applicants took reasonable steps to acquire the 3rd Respondent’s undivided share under s.4(2)(b)
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that Applicants met the statutory ownership threshold (85.42% ≥ 80% under s.3(5)), redevelopment was justified on grounds of age and poor state of repair based on expert structural and condition evidence and high repair costs, Applicants took reasonable steps to acquire the minority share (offers and settlement within fair range), proceeds to be apportioned by EUV, and the redevelopment (residual) valuation of $77,000,000 is an appropriate reserve price; accordingly an order for sale by public auction was granted with specified trustees and conditions.
Court Disposition
Order for sale granted in favour of the Applicants under the Land (Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Cap.545
Orders
- This Tribunal determines the EUV of the 3rd Respondent’s undivided share (Flat B, 4th Floor, No.92 Tak Cheong Street) as $960,000
- The Tribunal is satisfied redevelopment of the Lots is justified due to age and state of repair and that Applicants took reasonable steps to acquire the 3rd Respondent’s undivided shares
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment