GOOD FAITH PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS v. CIBEAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD
On a purposive construction of s.4(2) of Cap.545 the Tribunal must be satisfied at the hearing that redevelopment is justified and that the majority owner has taken reasonable steps to acquire outstanding shares; 'reasonable steps' includes offers made both pre- and post-application. Accepting the applicants' expert evidence, the Building is justified for redevelopment due to age and dangerous state; the applicants took reasonable steps and made offers within a broadly fair and reasonable range; accordingly an order for compulsory sale is granted and the Tribunal sets the reserve price at HKD 732,300,000 based on the Tribunal's adopted valuations (shop EUV HKD 35.20M, domestic EUV HKD...
- Citation
- GOOD FAITH PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS v. CIBEAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD
- Parties
- Applicants (majority Owners): Good Faith Properties Ltd and others; Respondent (minority Owner): Respondent (owner of basement shop, No.20 Caine Road)
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2013
- Case Number
- LDCS42000/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Sale Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Cap.545 / Judgment Following Trial
- Outcome
- Order for compulsory sale granted
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment, Justification for Redevelopment (age and State of Repair), Reasonable Steps to Acquire Minority Shares, Valuation: EUV and RDV, Reserve Price Determination, Procedural Timing of Offers
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Good Faith Properties Ltd and others
Applicants (majority Owners)
Respondent (owner of basement shop, No.20 Caine Road)
Respondent (minority Owner)
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Sale Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Cap.545 / Judgment Following Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether redevelopment of the Lot justified by age and state of repair of the Building
- 2 Whether the applicants took reasonable steps to acquire all undivided shares including whether post-application offers are cognizable
- 3 Whether the offers made were fair and reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
On a purposive construction of s.4(2) of Cap.545 the Tribunal must be satisfied at the hearing that redevelopment is justified and that the majority owner has taken reasonable steps to acquire outstanding shares; 'reasonable steps' includes offers made both pre- and post-application. Accepting the applicants' expert evidence, the Building is justified for redevelopment due to age and dangerous state; the applicants took reasonable steps and made offers within a broadly fair and reasonable range; accordingly an order for compulsory sale is granted and the Tribunal sets the reserve price at HKD 732,300,000 based on the Tribunal's adopted valuations (shop EUV HKD 35.20M, domestic EUV HKD...
Court Disposition
Order for compulsory sale granted
Orders
- All undivided shares in the Lot to be sold by public auction for purposes of redevelopment of the Lot
- Parties to agree nomination of Trustees within 14 days and file nomination for Tribunal approval; failing which apply to Tribunal for directions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment