YEUNG HOCK WAI also known as YEUNG HOCK WI v. CHAN WAI MAN, THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF YEUNG HUNG HEI PATRICK, DECEASED

YEUNG HOCK WAI also known as YEUNG HOCK WI v. CHAN WAI MAN, THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF YEUNG HUNG HEI PATRICK, DECEASED

The court found on the evidence the 1999 transfers were not proved to be conditional: alleged conditions were at best precatory and, in any event, void for uncertainty; alternatively any trust arising from breach would be a remedial (Type 2) constructive trust caught by the six‑year limitation and, together with inordinate delay, barred by laches; accordingly the plaintiff's claim failed and was dismissed.

Citation
[2020] HKCFI 1693
Parties
Plaintiff (original Action); Deceased Party Whose Estate Is Represented: Yeung Hock Wai (deceased); Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim); Administratrix of the Estate of Yeung Hung Hei Patrick (deceased): Chan Wai Man (Vivian); Personal Representative / Executrix of the Estate of Yeung Hock Wai; Defendant in Counterclaim; Party Carrying on Original Action on Behalf of Father's Estate: Asavayong Unruen (Mrs Yeung); 3rd Defendant (counterclaim); Donee Under the 1999 Transfers: Yeung Ka Hei (Jeffrey); Subject of Dispute; Beneficiary Under 1999 Transfers; Deceased Defendant Whose Estate Is Represented: Yeung Hung Hei Patrick (deceased)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
29 July 2020
Case Number
HCA2812/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Property/ Trust / Partition Dispute / Judgment at Trial (high Court, Court of First Instance)
Outcome
Plaintiff's claims dismissed in full; counterclaim/partition application to proceed by directions; costs reserved pending submissions
Legal Topics
Conditional Gift, Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Precatory Words, Uncertainty of Conditions, Section 3(1) CPO (disposition of Land), Limitation and Laches, Partition Proceedings
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yeung Hock Wai (deceased)

Plaintiff (original Action); Deceased Party Whose Estate Is Represented

Chan Wai Man (Vivian)

Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim); Administratrix of the Estate of Yeung Hung Hei Patrick (deceased)

Asavayong Unruen (Mrs Yeung)

Personal Representative / Executrix of the Estate of Yeung Hock Wai; Defendant in Counterclaim; Party Carrying on Original Action on Behalf of Father's Estate

Yeung Ka Hei (Jeffrey)

3rd Defendant (counterclaim); Donee Under the 1999 Transfers

Yeung Hung Hei Patrick (deceased)

Subject of Dispute; Beneficiary Under 1999 Transfers; Deceased Defendant Whose Estate Is Represented

Procedural Posture

Civil Property/ Trust / Partition Dispute / Judgment at Trial (high Court, Court of First Instance)

  1. 1 Whether the 1999 transfers were conditional gifts or absolute gifts
  2. 2 If conditional, whether conditions created legally enforceable obligations or were precatory
  3. 3 Whether conditions were void for uncertainty

Ratio Decidendi

The court found on the evidence the 1999 transfers were not proved to be conditional: alleged conditions were at best precatory and, in any event, void for uncertainty; alternatively any trust arising from breach would be a remedial (Type 2) constructive trust caught by the six‑year limitation and, together with inordinate delay, barred by laches; accordingly the plaintiff's claim failed and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claims dismissed in full; counterclaim/partition application to proceed by directions; costs reserved pending submissions

Orders

  • Dismissed the claims of Yeung Hock Wai (and his estate) against the estate of Yeung Hung Hei Patrick
  • Direct parties to submit an agreed order within 28 days incorporating the undertaking of Mrs Asavayong Unruen and Yeung Ka Hei to buy out Patrick's interests at the latest valuation; failing which each party to file its own draft order with written submissions (max 10 pages) for determination on paper