YEUNG HOCK WAI also known as YEUNG HOCK WI v. CHAN WAI MAN, THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF YEUNG HUNG HEI PATRICK, DECEASED
The court found on the evidence the 1999 transfers were not proved to be conditional: alleged conditions were at best precatory and, in any event, void for uncertainty; alternatively any trust arising from breach would be a remedial (Type 2) constructive trust caught by the six‑year limitation and, together with inordinate delay, barred by laches; accordingly the plaintiff's claim failed and was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 1693
- Parties
- Plaintiff (original Action); Deceased Party Whose Estate Is Represented: Yeung Hock Wai (deceased); Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim); Administratrix of the Estate of Yeung Hung Hei Patrick (deceased): Chan Wai Man (Vivian); Personal Representative / Executrix of the Estate of Yeung Hock Wai; Defendant in Counterclaim; Party Carrying on Original Action on Behalf of Father's Estate: Asavayong Unruen (Mrs Yeung); 3rd Defendant (counterclaim); Donee Under the 1999 Transfers: Yeung Ka Hei (Jeffrey); Subject of Dispute; Beneficiary Under 1999 Transfers; Deceased Defendant Whose Estate Is Represented: Yeung Hung Hei Patrick (deceased)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2020
- Case Number
- HCA2812/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Property/ Trust / Partition Dispute / Judgment at Trial (high Court, Court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claims dismissed in full; counterclaim/partition application to proceed by directions; costs reserved pending submissions
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Gift, Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Precatory Words, Uncertainty of Conditions, Section 3(1) CPO (disposition of Land), Limitation and Laches, Partition Proceedings
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yeung Hock Wai (deceased)
Plaintiff (original Action); Deceased Party Whose Estate Is Represented
Chan Wai Man (Vivian)
Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim); Administratrix of the Estate of Yeung Hung Hei Patrick (deceased)
Asavayong Unruen (Mrs Yeung)
Personal Representative / Executrix of the Estate of Yeung Hock Wai; Defendant in Counterclaim; Party Carrying on Original Action on Behalf of Father's Estate
Yeung Ka Hei (Jeffrey)
3rd Defendant (counterclaim); Donee Under the 1999 Transfers
Yeung Hung Hei Patrick (deceased)
Subject of Dispute; Beneficiary Under 1999 Transfers; Deceased Defendant Whose Estate Is Represented
Procedural Posture
Civil Property/ Trust / Partition Dispute / Judgment at Trial (high Court, Court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1999 transfers were conditional gifts or absolute gifts
- 2 If conditional, whether conditions created legally enforceable obligations or were precatory
- 3 Whether conditions were void for uncertainty
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the evidence the 1999 transfers were not proved to be conditional: alleged conditions were at best precatory and, in any event, void for uncertainty; alternatively any trust arising from breach would be a remedial (Type 2) constructive trust caught by the six‑year limitation and, together with inordinate delay, barred by laches; accordingly the plaintiff's claim failed and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claims dismissed in full; counterclaim/partition application to proceed by directions; costs reserved pending submissions
Orders
- Dismissed the claims of Yeung Hock Wai (and his estate) against the estate of Yeung Hung Hei Patrick
- Direct parties to submit an agreed order within 28 days incorporating the undertaking of Mrs Asavayong Unruen and Yeung Ka Hei to buy out Patrick's interests at the latest valuation; failing which each party to file its own draft order with written submissions (max 10 pages) for determination on paper
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment