CHENG CHUNG PONG AND ANOTHER v. WONG CHING AND OTHERS
Clause 11(n) must be construed, in the context of the will and the testator's evident intention to dispose of his estate under English law, as creating a special power of appointment in favour of a restricted class (male child surnamed Cheng of the Hakka clan under age five) exercisable by the widow and, failing...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- CHENG CHUNG PONG AND ANOTHER v. WONG CHING AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff; Trustee; Also 6th Defendant Beneficiary: Cheng Chung Pong; Plaintiff; Trustee: The Chartered Bank Hong Kong Trustee Limited; 1st Defendant: Wong Ching; 2nd Defendant: Tam Pui Yook; 3rd Defendant; Widow of Deceased Son: Cheng Yuen Yuk Lan; 4th Defendant: Cheng Pick Fai; 5th Defendant: Cheng Chung Kwan; 6th Defendant; Beneficiary: Cheng Chung Pong
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 1970
- Case Number
- HCMP53/1970
- Procedural Posture
- Original Jurisdiction; Will/probate Trust Interpretation (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Judgment (decision on Summons)
- Outcome
- Summons allowed in part: clause 11(n) is validly construed as conferring a power of special appointment on widow and trustees; trustees may and must exercise the power.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Will, Power of Appointment, Adoption (posthumous Adoption), Trustees' Duties and Powers, Accumulation and Intestacy, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheng Chung Pong
Plaintiff; Trustee; Also 6th Defendant Beneficiary
The Chartered Bank Hong Kong Trustee Limited
Plaintiff; Trustee
Wong Ching
1st Defendant
Tam Pui Yook
2nd Defendant
Cheng Yuen Yuk Lan
3rd Defendant; Widow of Deceased Son
Cheng Pick Fai
4th Defendant
Cheng Chung Kwan
5th Defendant
Cheng Chung Pong
6th Defendant; Beneficiary
Procedural Posture
Original Jurisdiction; Will/probate Trust Interpretation (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Judgment (decision on Summons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 11(n) of the will validly confers an adoption power exercisable by trustees
- 2 Whether the word 'adopt' must be read as Chinese posthumous adoption under Chinese law and custom
- 3 Whether the trustees are under a duty to exercise the power (mandatory) and cannot release it
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 11(n) must be construed, in the context of the will and the testator's evident intention to dispose of his estate under English law, as creating a special power of appointment in favour of a restricted class (male child surnamed Cheng of the Hakka clan under age five) exercisable by the widow and, failing her, by the trustees; the trustees are under a duty to exercise that power and cannot release it; consequently the clause is valid and may be exercised; surplus income accrued since the 21st anniversary is treated as intestate until such adoption is effected.
Court Disposition
Summons allowed in part: clause 11(n) is validly construed as conferring a power of special appointment on widow and trustees; trustees may and must exercise the power.
Orders
- Trustees are at liberty and under a duty to appoint a male child of the surname Cheng of the Hakka clan under five years under clause 11(n)
- Certificate for two counsel for proceedings in chambers on 3 December 1970
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment