SILVER STONE DEVELOPMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER v. LAU KWONG CHING, JAMES AND OTHERS
There is a real issue to be tried as to the authenticity of the 2nd Power of Attorney based on signature discrepancies and the unexplained delay in production; that triable issue defeats the strike out application because the plaintiffs' claim of conversion cannot be regarded as frivolous or an abuse of process absent trial of the authenticity and authority issues. The Master's refusal to strike out was correct and the appeal is dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- SILVER STONE DEVELOPMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER v. LAU KWONG CHING, JAMES AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: SILVER STONE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: LUI YUE YUN, GARY; 1st Defendant: LAU KWONG CHING, JAMES; 2nd Defendant: EDWARD KWOK; 3rd Defendant: CARRIER STOCK INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED; 4th Defendant: HO PUI TSUN, PETER; 5th Defendant: SZETO JOSEPH; 1st Third Party: KWOK WAI TAK, EDWARD; 2nd Third Party: ASIA GLORY HOLDINGS LIMITED; 3rd Third Party: HO PUI TSUN, PETER; 4th Third Party: SZETO JOSEPH
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2001
- Case Number
- HCA2206/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Interlocutory Decision (application to Strike Out) / Decision on Appeal in Chambers
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Conversion, Power of Attorney, Agency and Authority, Strike Out/application to Dismiss, Authenticity of Documents, Interlocutory Appeal
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SILVER STONE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
LUI YUE YUN, GARY
2nd Plaintiff
LAU KWONG CHING, JAMES
1st Defendant
EDWARD KWOK
2nd Defendant
CARRIER STOCK INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED
3rd Defendant
HO PUI TSUN, PETER
4th Defendant
SZETO JOSEPH
5th Defendant
KWOK WAI TAK, EDWARD
1st Third Party
ASIA GLORY HOLDINGS LIMITED
2nd Third Party
HO PUI TSUN, PETER
3rd Third Party
SZETO JOSEPH
4th Third Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Interlocutory Decision (application to Strike Out) / Decision on Appeal in Chambers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd Power of Attorney relied upon by the defendant is authentic
- 2 Whether the 3rd Defendant had lawful consent/authority to deal with the shares
- 3 Whether handing share certificates to HKSCCL and subsequent electronic transfers can constitute conversion
Ratio Decidendi
There is a real issue to be tried as to the authenticity of the 2nd Power of Attorney based on signature discrepancies and the unexplained delay in production; that triable issue defeats the strike out application because the plaintiffs' claim of conversion cannot be regarded as frivolous or an abuse of process absent trial of the authenticity and authority issues. The Master's refusal to strike out was correct and the appeal is dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment