STANDARD CHARTERED BANK
SCB was entitled to the costs of the consolidated actions but not to full costs because although SCB did not act improperly in advancing the misrepresentation cause, that cause materially increased preparation costs; a 15% reduction of SCB's recoverable costs is appropriate, resulting in SCB receiving 85% of the costs; no reduction was ordered for Requisition 7.
- Citation
- STANDARD CHARTERED BANK
- Parties
- Plaintiff in HCA2634 / Defendant in HCA2645: Goldenwick Limited; Defendant in HCA2634 / Plaintiff in HCA2645: Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 June 2008
- Case Number
- HCA2645/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Consolidated Civil Actions Concerning Property Title and Misrepresentation; Costs Application / Costs Decision on Variation of Costs Order Nisi After Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Costs order nisi varied: Standard Chartered Bank to recover 85% of the costs of the two consolidated actions including reserved costs, taxed if not agreed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Title to Property, Requisition Issues (missing Documents; Undivided Share; Common Parts/right of Way), Misrepresentation (inducement), Costs Taxation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Goldenwick Limited
Plaintiff in HCA2634 / Defendant in HCA2645
Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited
Defendant in HCA2634 / Plaintiff in HCA2645
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Civil Actions Concerning Property Title and Misrepresentation; Costs Application / Costs Decision on Variation of Costs Order Nisi After Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Goldenwick proved good title to the Property (Requisition 7 and Requisition 12)
- 2 Whether SCB proved misrepresentation and inducement to enter agreements
- 3 Whether SCB acted improperly or unnecessarily in raising the misrepresentation cause so as to forfeit costs
Ratio Decidendi
SCB was entitled to the costs of the consolidated actions but not to full costs because although SCB did not act improperly in advancing the misrepresentation cause, that cause materially increased preparation costs; a 15% reduction of SCB's recoverable costs is appropriate, resulting in SCB receiving 85% of the costs; no reduction was ordered for Requisition 7.
Court Disposition
Costs order nisi varied: Standard Chartered Bank to recover 85% of the costs of the two consolidated actions including reserved costs, taxed if not agreed
Orders
- Order varied so that Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited shall have 85% of the costs of the two consolidated actions including all costs reserved, to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment