MAN PING NAM v. MAN MEI KWAI
The court varied the costs apportionment: the 2nd Defendants are entitled to one half of the costs of the trial because, although they lost on the construction of s.15, pursuing that legal issue was not improper or unreasonable; the court refused to make additional separate costs for the Notice to Admit given the timing and minimal marginal costs; the court confirmed that costs of the counterclaim relating to s.15 should be paid from Wui funds and taxed on a common fund basis. The varied order nisi was made absolute and certain costs of the hearing were allocated accordingly.
- Citation
- MAN PING NAM v. MAN MEI KWAI
- Parties
- Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim) and Manager of Man Sham Chung Wui: MAN PING NAM; Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim): MAN MEI KWAI; Collective Entity (wui) Subject of Dispute: MAN SHAM CHUNG WUI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2002
- Case Number
- HCA9852/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action and Counterclaim Concerning Construction of New Territories Ordinance S.15 and Management of Wui; Costs Application / Post‑judgment Application to Vary Costs Order Nisi; Judgment on Costs Application (order Made Absolute)
- Outcome
- Order nisi as to costs varied in part and made absolute; other parts of original costs order nisi upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Allocation and Apportionment, Construction of New Territories Ordinance S.15, Common Fund Taxation, Notice to Admit Fact (o.62 R.3(5))
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MAN PING NAM
Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim) and Manager of Man Sham Chung Wui
MAN MEI KWAI
Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim)
MAN SHAM CHUNG WUI
Collective Entity (wui) Subject of Dispute
Procedural Posture
Civil Action and Counterclaim Concerning Construction of New Territories Ordinance S.15 and Management of Wui; Costs Application / Post‑judgment Application to Vary Costs Order Nisi; Judgment on Costs Application (order Made Absolute)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 2nd Defendants are entitled to costs for legal and factual issues despite losing on construction of s.15
- 2 Whether a late Notice to Admit Fact entitled the 2nd Defendants to additional separate costs for proof of those facts
- 3 Whether costs of the counterclaim should be taxed on a common fund basis payable from Wui funds
Ratio Decidendi
The court varied the costs apportionment: the 2nd Defendants are entitled to one half of the costs of the trial because, although they lost on the construction of s.15, pursuing that legal issue was not improper or unreasonable; the court refused to make additional separate costs for the Notice to Admit given the timing and minimal marginal costs; the court confirmed that costs of the counterclaim relating to s.15 should be paid from Wui funds and taxed on a common fund basis. The varied order nisi was made absolute and certain costs of the hearing were allocated accordingly.
Court Disposition
Order nisi as to costs varied in part and made absolute; other parts of original costs order nisi upheld.
Orders
- Sub‑paragraph (f) varied: costs of trial apportioned 1/4 to Plaintiff's original action; 1/2 to issues concerning proper construction of Section 15 of the New Territories Ordinance; 1/4 to the alleged tenancy of the 2nd Defendants; aggregate result that 2nd Defendants receive 1/2 of the costs of the trial (1/2 of...
- Plaintiff to pay Defendant his costs of the counterclaim out of the funds and, if necessary, other properties and assets of the Wui, to be taxed on a common fund basis if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment