FUNG TIN YAU (IN HIS OWN CAPACITY AND SUING AS A SHAREHOLDER OF MAXFORTUNE TRADING LTD AND ON BEHALF OF MAXFORTUNE TRADING LTD AS SHAREHOLDER OF SAMDOR CO LTD) v. FUNG TIN SHING AND OTHERS
The court varied the costs orders: the Petitioner was awarded the costs of all three sets of appeals including reserved costs for the Directions Hearing, to be summarily assessed and paid; the court applied a broad-brush summary assessment reducing claimed time and fees, fixed the Total Appeal Costs at HK$700,000 payable within 14 days, ordered that Direction Summons costs be in the cause, and summarily assessed the Costs Summons at HK$5,000 to be set off against the appeal costs.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 1051
- Parties
- Petitioner: Fung Tin Yau; 1st Respondent: Fung Tin Shing; 2nd Respondent: Fung Wing See; 3rd Respondent: Lai Ng Nui; 4th Respondent: Fung Wing Yan; 5th Respondent: Fung Wing Yin; 6th Respondent: Great Anchor International Limited; 7th Respondent: Maxfortune Trading Limited; 8th Respondent: Premium Management Limited; 9th Respondent: Wyse Investment Limited; 10th Respondent: Samdor Company Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 2020
- Case Number
- HCCW171/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Proceedings and Consolidated Appeals / Decision on Costs (post Appeal and Post Directions)
- Outcome
- Costs orders nisi varied: Petitioner awarded costs of appeals summarily assessed; Direction Summons costs ordered in the cause; Costs Summons summarily assessed and set off against appeal costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Summary Assessment, Apportionment of Costs, Directions Summons, Strike Out Applications, Two Counsel Certificate
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fung Tin Yau
Petitioner
Fung Tin Shing
1st Respondent
Fung Wing See
2nd Respondent
Lai Ng Nui
3rd Respondent
Fung Wing Yan
4th Respondent
Fung Wing Yin
5th Respondent
Great Anchor International Limited
6th Respondent
Maxfortune Trading Limited
7th Respondent
Premium Management Limited
8th Respondent
Wyse Investment Limited
9th Respondent
Samdor Company Limited
10th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Proceedings and Consolidated Appeals / Decision on Costs (post Appeal and Post Directions)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs order nisi for the appeals should be varied to include costs of the Directions Hearing of 11 January 2019
- 2 Appropriate quantum for the Petitioner’s claimed appeal costs
- 3 Whether costs of the Direction Summons should be in the cause
Ratio Decidendi
The court varied the costs orders: the Petitioner was awarded the costs of all three sets of appeals including reserved costs for the Directions Hearing, to be summarily assessed and paid; the court applied a broad-brush summary assessment reducing claimed time and fees, fixed the Total Appeal Costs at HK$700,000 payable within 14 days, ordered that Direction Summons costs be in the cause, and summarily assessed the Costs Summons at HK$5,000 to be set off against the appeal costs.
Court Disposition
Costs orders nisi varied: Petitioner awarded costs of appeals summarily assessed; Direction Summons costs ordered in the cause; Costs Summons summarily assessed and set off against appeal costs.
Orders
- The Petitioner shall have the costs of all 3 Sets of Appeals, including the reserved costs for the Directions Hearing of 11 January 2019, to be summarily assessed
- Costs of the appeals in respect of the 2078 Strike Out Summons to be borne by Madam Lai and Jenny
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment