莫懿 v 宏大香港資產管理有限公司 AND ANOTHER
The court exercised its summary assessment powers to disallow excessive time-based claims and to fix reasonable lump-sum assessments: Section D (preparation/perusal/preparation for hearing) was summarily assessed at HK$100,000, counsel fee was fixed at HK$55,000, Part I was summarily assessed at HK$190,000 and Part...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 251
- Parties
- Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim): 莫懿; 1st Defendant (original Action); 1st Plaintiff (counterclaim): 宏大香港資產管理有限公司; 2nd Defendant (original Action); 2nd Plaintiff (counterclaim): 陳宏; 2nd Defendant (counterclaim): DENG ZHI(鄧智)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2022
- Case Number
- HCA897/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Costs Assessment / Decision on Costs (second Decision)
- Outcome
- Second Decision on Costs assessing and fixing costs as set out below and making no further costs order
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Summary Assessment, Counsel Fees
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
莫懿
Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim)
宏大香港資產管理有限公司
1st Defendant (original Action); 1st Plaintiff (counterclaim)
陳宏
2nd Defendant (original Action); 2nd Plaintiff (counterclaim)
DENG ZHI(鄧智)
2nd Defendant (counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Civil Costs Assessment / Decision on Costs (second Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimed costs relate to the specific application or to the main action/defence
- 2 Whether time claimed for preparation and perusal (Sections D1–D3) was excessive
- 3 What constitutes a reasonable counsel fee
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its summary assessment powers to disallow excessive time-based claims and to fix reasonable lump-sum assessments: Section D (preparation/perusal/preparation for hearing) was summarily assessed at HK$100,000, counsel fee was fixed at HK$55,000, Part I was summarily assessed at HK$190,000 and Part II at HK$19,000; costs must relate to the application and excessive elements are to be reduced accordingly.
Court Disposition
Second Decision on Costs assessing and fixing costs as set out below and making no further costs order
Orders
- Part I (O.14 Summons) summarily assessed at HK$190,000.
- Part II (application to vary Costs Order Nisi) summarily assessed at HK$19,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment