GREAT SOURCE ENTERPRISE LTD v. 陳德明 AND OTHERS
Defendants imposed oppressive and unreasonable conditions that obstructed the plaintiff's statutory and contractual right under clause 58 of the DMC; that conduct amounted to gross negligence; because the plaintiff obtained substantially what he sought by receipt of duplicate tapes on 12 July 2005 the court awarded costs to the plaintiff up to that date, with no order as to costs between 12 and 28 July 2005, and ordered that costs from 28 July 2005 until discontinuance follow the normal rule and be paid by the plaintiff to the defendants.
- Citation
- GREAT SOURCE ENTERPRISE LTD v. 陳德明 AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff; Owner of Unit B, 6th Floor, Block 2, 8 Yin Ping Road, Dynasty Heights: Plaintiff; Chairperson, 3rd Owners Committee (one of the Defendants): 1st Defendant; Members of the 3rd Owners Committee (including 2nd Defendant as Secretary): Defendants (2nd–11th)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2010
- Case Number
- HCA1189/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil — Owners Committee / Access to Records Dispute / Costs Application Following Leave to Discontinue (post Discontinuance Costs Reserved)
- Outcome
- Costs partially awarded to the Plaintiff: costs up to 12 July 2005 to be paid by the Defendants; no order as to costs for period 12–28 July 2005; costs from 28 July 2005 to discontinuance to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Costs of Discontinued Proceedings, Access to Corporate/committee Records, Deed of Mutual Covenant Interpretation, Indemnity and Undertaking Requirements, Gross Negligence of Committee Members
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff; Owner of Unit B, 6th Floor, Block 2, 8 Yin Ping Road, Dynasty Heights
1st Defendant
Chairperson, 3rd Owners Committee (one of the Defendants)
Defendants (2nd–11th)
Members of the 3rd Owners Committee (including 2nd Defendant as Secretary)
Procedural Posture
Civil — Owners Committee / Access to Records Dispute / Costs Application Following Leave to Discontinue (post Discontinuance Costs Reserved)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether owners are entitled to access and duplicates of owners' committee meeting tape recordings under clause 58 of the DMC
- 2 Whether the defendants' imposition of onerous undertakings and charges justified an award of costs to the plaintiff despite discontinuance
- 3 Whether the defendants' conduct amounted to gross negligence such that costs should follow the plaintiff despite general rule that costs follow the event
Ratio Decidendi
Defendants imposed oppressive and unreasonable conditions that obstructed the plaintiff's statutory and contractual right under clause 58 of the DMC; that conduct amounted to gross negligence; because the plaintiff obtained substantially what he sought by receipt of duplicate tapes on 12 July 2005 the court awarded costs to the plaintiff up to that date, with no order as to costs between 12 and 28 July 2005, and ordered that costs from 28 July 2005 until discontinuance follow the normal rule and be paid by the plaintiff to the defendants.
Court Disposition
Costs partially awarded to the Plaintiff: costs up to 12 July 2005 to be paid by the Defendants; no order as to costs for period 12–28 July 2005; costs from 28 July 2005 to discontinuance to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendants.
Orders
- Costs of the action up to 12 July 2005 awarded to the Plaintiff and payable by the Defendants; to be taxed if not agreed.
- No order as to costs for the period from 12 July 2005 to 28 July 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment