LEE CHICK CHOI v. BEST SPIRITS CO LTD
Leave to appeal was refused because the review application was made nearly two years out of time without reasonable explanation, leave had previously been dismissed, and there was no error of law or jurisdiction in the Tribunal's discretionary costs order.
- Citation
- LEE CHICK CHOI v. BEST SPIRITS CO LTD
- Parties
- Appellant (claimant): Lee Chick Choi; Respondent (defendant): Best Spirits Co Ltd
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2014
- Case Number
- HCLA19/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Tribunal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Costs Order (leave Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Leave to Appeal, Extension of Time, Application for Review
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lee Chick Choi
Appellant (claimant)
Best Spirits Co Ltd
Respondent (defendant)
Procedural Posture
Labour Tribunal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Costs Order (leave Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's review of the costs order was out of time
- 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted despite delay and previous dismissal of leave
- 3 Whether the Presiding Officer erred in law or exceeded jurisdiction in making the costs order
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the review application was made nearly two years out of time without reasonable explanation, leave had previously been dismissed, and there was no error of law or jurisdiction in the Tribunal's discretionary costs order.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment