TAM LAN CHI LORCHE, suing as an Administratrix of the Estate of Tam Kam Fai Francis, deceased v. CHAN SIU MUI
The 19 July 2007 Declaration, being in writing and signed by both parties, validly created a beneficial joint tenancy under s5 CPO; the obvious typographical omission did not defeat the clear expressed intention and could be corrected; consequentially on the deceased's death the defendant became sole beneficial owner; mistakes in the LA Schedule do not operate to renounce the beneficial interest and are correctable under s24A; IRD and Land Registry remarks are not binding on the court's determination of substantive title.
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 517
- Parties
- Plaintiff; Administratrix of the Estate of Tam Kam Fai (deceased): Tam Lan Chi Lorche (譚蘭芝); Defendant; Administratrix of the Estate of Tam Kam Fai (deceased): Chan Siu Mui (陳小梅)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2022
- Case Number
- HCMP2084/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Order 85 (declaration of Trust in Estate) / Final Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed; defendant's counterclaim allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Trust, Joint Tenancy Vs Tenancy in Common, Construction and Rectification of Instruments, Effect of Registry and Tax Authority Decisions on Substantive Title, Corrective Affidavit Under Probate and Administration Ordinance S24 a
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tam Lan Chi Lorche (譚蘭芝)
Plaintiff; Administratrix of the Estate of Tam Kam Fai (deceased)
Chan Siu Mui (陳小梅)
Defendant; Administratrix of the Estate of Tam Kam Fai (deceased)
Procedural Posture
Application Under Order 85 (declaration of Trust in Estate) / Final Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 19 July 2007 Declaration validly created a beneficial joint tenancy
- 2 Whether the Declaration could convert an existing tenancy in common into a joint tenancy without a deed of assignment
- 3 Whether the defendant's affirmation verifying the Schedule (LA Declaration) amounted to a renunciation of her beneficial interest under the Declaration
Ratio Decidendi
The 19 July 2007 Declaration, being in writing and signed by both parties, validly created a beneficial joint tenancy under s5 CPO; the obvious typographical omission did not defeat the clear expressed intention and could be corrected; consequentially on the deceased's death the defendant became sole beneficial owner; mistakes in the LA Schedule do not operate to renounce the beneficial interest and are correctable under s24A; IRD and Land Registry remarks are not binding on the court's determination of substantive title.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed; defendant's counterclaim allowed.
Orders
- The plaintiff's claim in these proceedings is dismissed.
- Declaration that the Declaration dated 19 July 2007 created a beneficial joint tenancy over the Property between the deceased and the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment