THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF PO HANG BUILDING v. SAM WOO MARINE WORKS LTD
The Tribunal adopts the interpretation in DCCJ 1271/2011: Clause 3(i) concerns total monthly payments by all owners and does not require exhaustion of any class's surplus before levying further contributions; Clause 3(j) allows surplus to be held and applied at the IO's discretion for building expenses within the scope of Clause 3(f); there is no express or implied term in the DMC requiring separate carry‑forwards or class‑specific application of surplus, so the reliefs sought by Sam Woo fail; because the IO validly adopted revised budgets and accounts and is empowered by the BMO to demand management fees, Sam Woo is liable for outstanding fees of HK$237,884 plus interest, while claims...
- Citation
- [2020] HKLdT 56
- Parties
- Applicant (ldbm 252/2014); Respondent (ldbm 255/2018): Sam Woo Marine Works Ltd; Respondent (ldbm 252/2014); Applicant (ldbm 255/2018): The Incorporated Owners of Po Hang Building
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2020
- Case Number
- LDBM255/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Building Management Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- LDBM 252/2014: all declaratory and accounting reliefs (Reliefs 1,2,3,5) refused as unnecessary, academic or unsupported; Relief 4 (refund) abandoned. LDBM 255/2018: IO's claim for outstanding management fees 1.9.2012–12.2018 allowed in part; claim for post‑January 2019 fees disallowed as not yet accrued.
- Legal Topics
- Deed of Mutual Covenant, Management Fees, Accounts and Surplus Allocation, Res Judicata, Acquiescence, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sam Woo Marine Works Ltd
Applicant (ldbm 252/2014); Respondent (ldbm 255/2018)
The Incorporated Owners of Po Hang Building
Respondent (ldbm 252/2014); Applicant (ldbm 255/2018)
Procedural Posture
Building Management Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deed of Mutual Covenant (Clauses 3(h),(i),(j)) implies a duty on the Incorporated Owners to keep separate accounts and to allocate surplus by classes of owners
- 2 Whether surplus attributable to a class must be exhausted for that class before further contributions/management fees can be demanded
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs are estopped/res judicata barred from re‑arguing the interpretation decided in DCCJ 1271/2011
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal adopts the interpretation in DCCJ 1271/2011: Clause 3(i) concerns total monthly payments by all owners and does not require exhaustion of any class's surplus before levying further contributions; Clause 3(j) allows surplus to be held and applied at the IO's discretion for building expenses within the scope of Clause 3(f); there is no express or implied term in the DMC requiring separate carry‑forwards or class‑specific application of surplus, so the reliefs sought by Sam Woo fail; because the IO validly adopted revised budgets and accounts and is empowered by the BMO to demand management fees, Sam Woo is liable for outstanding fees of HK$237,884 plus interest, while claims...
Court Disposition
LDBM 252/2014: all declaratory and accounting reliefs (Reliefs 1,2,3,5) refused as unnecessary, academic or unsupported; Relief 4 (refund) abandoned. LDBM 255/2018: IO's claim for outstanding management fees 1.9.2012–12.2018 allowed in part; claim for post‑January 2019 fees disallowed as not yet accrued.
Orders
- Sam Woo Marine Works Ltd to pay The Incorporated Owners of Po Hang Building HK$237,884 outstanding management fees (period Sept 2012–Dec 2018)
- Interest on HK$237,884 at judgment rate from date of judgment (24 December 2020) until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment