CHAN CHUNG WAI AND OTHERS v. CHEUNG WAI PUI AND OTHERS
Master held the court had jurisdiction to grant interim payment in a derivative action and exercised discretion to order payment into the 8th defendant's account with plaintiffs as signatory; accepted plaintiffs' expert methodology and 27.02% gross profit ratio because defendants failed to produce cost and transactional records and thus failed to discharge burden to account; rejected double‑counting objection on the facts and accepted inclusion of goodwill; ordered interim payment of HK$10,170,083 and directed further disclosure and inquiry as per the consent judgment.
- Citation
- CHAN CHUNG WAI AND OTHERS v. CHEUNG WAI PUI AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Chan Chung Wai; 2nd Plaintiff: Chan Chung Chun; 3rd Plaintiff: Chan Chung Yin; 4th Plaintiff: Chiu Pui Ching; 1st Defendant: Cheung Wai Pui; 2nd Defendant: Chang Kuo Hsien; 3rd Defendant: Chang Wei Chung; 4th Defendant: Wai Wan Chin; 5th Defendant: Rainbow Come Limited; 6th Defendant: Jin Jiang Trading Co. (H.K.) Ltd.; 7th Defendant: Elegant View Limited; 8th Defendant: Jan Nam Hong Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2005
- Case Number
- HCA8721/1996
- Procedural Posture
- Derivative Action (company) / Application for Inquiry and Interim Payment (interim Hearing)
- Outcome
- Application for interim payment granted; interim payment of HK$10,170,083 ordered to be paid into the 8th defendant's account with plaintiffs as signatory; inquiry into full accounts adjourned with directions for further disclosure.
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Action, Interim Payment (order 29), Account of Profits, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Expert Accounting Evidence, Intragroup Transaction Elimination (double Counting), Goodwill Valuation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chan Chung Wai
1st Plaintiff
Chan Chung Chun
2nd Plaintiff
Chan Chung Yin
3rd Plaintiff
Chiu Pui Ching
4th Plaintiff
Cheung Wai Pui
1st Defendant
Chang Kuo Hsien
2nd Defendant
Chang Wei Chung
3rd Defendant
Wai Wan Chin
4th Defendant
Rainbow Come Limited
5th Defendant
Jin Jiang Trading Co. (H.K.) Ltd.
6th Defendant
Elegant View Limited
7th Defendant
Jan Nam Hong Limited
8th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Derivative Action (company) / Application for Inquiry and Interim Payment (interim Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to order an interim payment in a derivative action to be paid into the company account with the plaintiffs as signatory
- 2 Whether Order 29 permits payment into the company account rather than to plaintiffs or into court
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs can withdraw funds from the company account
Ratio Decidendi
Master held the court had jurisdiction to grant interim payment in a derivative action and exercised discretion to order payment into the 8th defendant's account with plaintiffs as signatory; accepted plaintiffs' expert methodology and 27.02% gross profit ratio because defendants failed to produce cost and transactional records and thus failed to discharge burden to account; rejected double‑counting objection on the facts and accepted inclusion of goodwill; ordered interim payment of HK$10,170,083 and directed further disclosure and inquiry as per the consent judgment.
Court Disposition
Application for interim payment granted; interim payment of HK$10,170,083 ordered to be paid into the 8th defendant's account with plaintiffs as signatory; inquiry into full accounts adjourned with directions for further disclosure.
Orders
- Interim payment of HK$10,170,083 (period 1990–2003) to be paid into the 8th defendant's bank account with plaintiffs as one of the signatories
- Draft order submitted by plaintiffs approved as amended (including directions for payment mechanics and disclosure)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment