SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. CHEUNG KENG CHING AND OTHERS
On the uncontested facts the court found that the four transactions amounted to misfeasance/defalcation, breaches of directors' duties and conduct unfairly prejudicial to members under s214; accordingly the court made disqualification orders (R3 for 4 years; R1 and R2 for 5 years) and ordered Rontex to commence High Court civil proceedings against R1, R2 and R3 within 60 days with specified directions allowing use of admissions/documents from these proceedings, modest quarterly reporting to the SFC and liberty to apply for further directions; witness expenses and costs procedure ordered.
- Citation
- SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. CHEUNG KENG CHING AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Petitioner: Securities and Futures Commission; 1st Respondent: Cheung Keng Ching; 2nd Respondent: Chou Mei; 3rd Respondent: Man, Kevin; 4th Respondent (company): Rontex International Holdings Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2010
- Case Number
- HCMP1869/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Section 214 Disqualification Petition Under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (cap.571) / Judgment and Orders (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Disqualification orders made against R1, R2 and R3; Rontex ordered to commence civil proceedings against R1, R2 and R3 with specified directions; witness expenses allowed; costs submissions to be filed and final costs order reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Misfeasance and Defalcation, Unfair Prejudice, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Disclosure Obligations Under Listing Rules, Directions for Civil Recovery
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Securities and Futures Commission
Petitioner
Cheung Keng Ching
1st Respondent
Chou Mei
2nd Respondent
Man, Kevin
3rd Respondent
Rontex International Holdings Limited
4th Respondent (company)
Procedural Posture
Section 214 Disqualification Petition Under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (cap.571) / Judgment and Orders (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents' conduct in four specific transactions constituted misfeasance/defalcation and/or conduct unfairly prejudicial to members under s214
- 2 Whether respondents breached disclosure obligations under the Listing Rules
- 3 Whether and for what period disqualification orders should be made against the respondents
Ratio Decidendi
On the uncontested facts the court found that the four transactions amounted to misfeasance/defalcation, breaches of directors' duties and conduct unfairly prejudicial to members under s214; accordingly the court made disqualification orders (R3 for 4 years; R1 and R2 for 5 years) and ordered Rontex to commence High Court civil proceedings against R1, R2 and R3 within 60 days with specified directions allowing use of admissions/documents from these proceedings, modest quarterly reporting to the SFC and liberty to apply for further directions; witness expenses and costs procedure ordered.
Court Disposition
Disqualification orders made against R1, R2 and R3; Rontex ordered to commence civil proceedings against R1, R2 and R3 with specified directions; witness expenses allowed; costs submissions to be filed and final costs order reserved.
Orders
- 3rd Respondent (Man, Kevin) is disqualified for 4 years from acting as director, liquidator, receiver or manager or taking part in management of any corporation or their subsidiaries or affiliates without leave of the court
- 1st and 2nd Respondents (Cheung Keng Ching and Chou Mei) are disqualified for 5 years from acting as director, liquidator, receiver or manager or taking part in management of any corporation or their subsidiaries or affiliates without leave of the court (save and except RC Apparels Limited)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment