SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. YEUNG KUI WONG AND OTHERS
On the agreed facts the 2nd Respondent participated in failures of disclosure and other lapses amounting to misfeasance or misconduct; his mitigating arguments did not distinguish him sufficiently from similarly situated directors and a five year disqualification order was warranted; the 6th Respondent's lesser role warranted a two year disqualification order. Costs to follow the parties' agreement.
- Citation
- SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. YEUNG KUI WONG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Petitioner: Securities and Futures Commission; 1st Respondent: Yeung Kui Wong; 2nd Respondent: Hung Kwok Wa Godfrey; 3rd Respondent: Lai Wing Chuen John; 4th Respondent: Yeung Ying Fong Ellen; 5th Respondent: Yu Hung Wong; 6th Respondent: Leung Ping Chung Hermann
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 1 March 2011
- Case Number
- HCMP1742/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Carecraft Summary Proceedings Under Section 214 SFO / Judgment Following Summary Carecraft Hearing
- Outcome
- Disqualification orders granted against the 2nd and 6th Respondents and costs ordered as agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Disclosure Obligations, Connected Transactions, Misfeasance and Misconduct, Carecraft Proceedings, Section 214 SFO
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Securities and Futures Commission
Petitioner
Yeung Kui Wong
1st Respondent
Hung Kwok Wa Godfrey
2nd Respondent
Lai Wing Chuen John
3rd Respondent
Yeung Ying Fong Ellen
4th Respondent
Yu Hung Wong
5th Respondent
Leung Ping Chung Hermann
6th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Carecraft Summary Proceedings Under Section 214 SFO / Judgment Following Summary Carecraft Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd and 6th Respondents engaged in conduct amounting to misfeasance or misconduct in relation to Warderly's business and affairs
- 2 Whether disqualification orders should be made and if so their scope and duration
- 3 Whether the 2nd Respondent's disqualification should be limited to listed companies only
Ratio Decidendi
On the agreed facts the 2nd Respondent participated in failures of disclosure and other lapses amounting to misfeasance or misconduct; his mitigating arguments did not distinguish him sufficiently from similarly situated directors and a five year disqualification order was warranted; the 6th Respondent's lesser role warranted a two year disqualification order. Costs to follow the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
Disqualification orders granted against the 2nd and 6th Respondents and costs ordered as agreed.
Orders
- 2nd Respondent (Hung Kwok Wa Godfrey) is disqualified for 5 years from being or continuing to be a director, liquidator, receiver or manager of the property or business of any listed or unlisted company in Hong Kong or their subsidiaries or affiliates and from directly or indirectly taking part in the management of...
- 6th Respondent (Leung Ping Chung Hermann) is disqualified for 2 years from being or continuing to be a director, liquidator, receiver or manager of the property or business of any listed company in Hong Kong or their subsidiaries or affiliates and from directly or indirectly taking part in the management of any such...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment