SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. LI WING SANG (A BANKRUPT) AND OTHERS
On the evidence the 1st Respondent breached his duties by failing to recover Fan's Debt, failing to obtain control and oversight of Fuchao, failing to cause impairment provisions and permitting false or misleading disclosures; that conduct fell within s214(1)(b)-(d) and justified a middle‑bracket disqualification; the court imposed a 7‑year disqualification under s214(2)(d) and ordered the respondent to pay the Petitioner's costs.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 466
- Parties
- Petitioner: Securities and Futures Commission; 1st Respondent (a Bankrupt): Li Wing Sang (李永生); 2nd Respondent: Liu Xinsheng (劉新生); 3rd Respondent (a Bankrupt): Chiu Chi Hong (招自康)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2025
- Case Number
- HCMP2068/2020
- Procedural Posture
- SFO S214 Petition (director Disqualification) / Judgment After Trial (petition Against 1st Respondent)
- Outcome
- 1st Respondent disqualified for 7 years under s214(2)(d) SFO; costs awarded to Petitioner
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Breach of Director Duties, Misfeasance, Misleading/disclosure Obligations, Financial Reporting and Impairment Provisions, Supervision and Oversight of Subsidiaries
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Securities and Futures Commission
Petitioner
Li Wing Sang (李永生)
1st Respondent (a Bankrupt)
Liu Xinsheng (劉新生)
2nd Respondent
Chiu Chi Hong (招自康)
3rd Respondent (a Bankrupt)
Procedural Posture
SFO S214 Petition (director Disqualification) / Judgment After Trial (petition Against 1st Respondent)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the companys business or affairs were conducted in a manner falling within s214(1)(b)-(d) of the SFO
- 2 Whether the 1st Respondent breached duties by failing to take reasonable steps to recover Fan's Debt
- 3 Whether the 1st Respondent failed to obtain sufficient control and oversight of Fuchao
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence the 1st Respondent breached his duties by failing to recover Fan's Debt, failing to obtain control and oversight of Fuchao, failing to cause impairment provisions and permitting false or misleading disclosures; that conduct fell within s214(1)(b)-(d) and justified a middle‑bracket disqualification; the court imposed a 7‑year disqualification under s214(2)(d) and ordered the respondent to pay the Petitioner's costs.
Court Disposition
1st Respondent disqualified for 7 years under s214(2)(d) SFO; costs awarded to Petitioner
Orders
- Pursuant to section 214(2)(d) Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571), the 1st Respondent shall not for a period of 7 years from the date of this Order, without leave of the Court, be, or continue to be, a director, liquidator, or receiver or manager of the property or business of any listed or unlisted...
- The 1st Respondent shall pay the Petitioner's costs in these proceedings, to be taxed if not agreed, with certificate for two counsel for the period up to and including 14 December 2021 and certificate for one counsel thereafter up to and including the date of this Order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment