SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. WANG JIAN HUA AND OTHERS
The court found the 1st respondent engaged in active, serious self‑dealing and concealment warranting a top‑bracket disqualification of 10 years; the 2nd and 3rd respondents committed failures of care and diligence (omissions) warranting middle‑bracket disqualifications of 6 years each; the proper protective scope extends to listed and unlisted companies including subsidiaries and affiliates; the Commission is entitled to costs with a certificate for two counsel.
- Citation
- SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. WANG JIAN HUA AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Petitioner: Securities and Futures Commission; 1st Respondent: WANG JIAN HUA; 2nd Respondent: MA JUN LI; 3rd Respondent: ZHANG DA QING; 4th Respondent: CHINA BEST GROUP HOLDING LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2016
- Case Number
- HCMP745/2013
- Procedural Posture
- HCMP 745/2013 Petition Under Section 214 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance / Judgment on Petition (order on Disqualification and Costs)
- Outcome
- Disqualification orders made: 1st respondent 10 years; 2nd respondent 6 years; 3rd respondent 6 years. Orders extend to listed and unlisted companies in Hong Kong including the 4th respondent and its subsidiaries and affiliates. Costs awarded to the Securities and Futures Commission with a certificate for two counsel.
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Disqualification, Misfeasance, Conflict of Interest, Section 214 SFO, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Securities and Futures Commission
Petitioner
WANG JIAN HUA
1st Respondent
MA JUN LI
2nd Respondent
ZHANG DA QING
3rd Respondent
CHINA BEST GROUP HOLDING LIMITED
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
HCMP 745/2013 Petition Under Section 214 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance / Judgment on Petition (order on Disqualification and Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate length of disqualification for each respondent
- 2 Proper scope of disqualification orders (whether to include unlisted companies and affiliates)
- 3 Entitlement to costs and quantum of counsel certificate
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the 1st respondent engaged in active, serious self‑dealing and concealment warranting a top‑bracket disqualification of 10 years; the 2nd and 3rd respondents committed failures of care and diligence (omissions) warranting middle‑bracket disqualifications of 6 years each; the proper protective scope extends to listed and unlisted companies including subsidiaries and affiliates; the Commission is entitled to costs with a certificate for two counsel.
Court Disposition
Disqualification orders made: 1st respondent 10 years; 2nd respondent 6 years; 3rd respondent 6 years. Orders extend to listed and unlisted companies in Hong Kong including the 4th respondent and its subsidiaries and affiliates. Costs awarded to the Securities and Futures Commission with a certificate for two counsel.
Orders
- 1st respondent (WANG JIAN HUA) is disqualified for 10 years from acting, without the leave of the Court, as a director, liquidator, receiver or manager of the property or business of any listed or unlisted company in Hong Kong including China Best Group Holding Limited or any of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
- 2nd respondent (MA JUN LI) is disqualified for 6 years from acting, without the leave of the Court, as a director, liquidator, receiver or manager of the property or business of any listed or unlisted company in Hong Kong including China Best Group Holding Limited or any of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment