BEATRICE TSANG SAU HING AND ANOTHER v. YEUNG MAN LOONG MAXLY AND OTHERS
Directors retain a right to inspect company documents after appointment of provisional liquidators provided such inspection does not impede the provisional liquidators in the proper discharge of their duties or prejudice the company; provisional liquidators' possession of documents is not exclusive; court will grant inspection of documents held in Hong Kong subject to confidentiality undertakings and costs, and will adjourn inspection of documents at the PRC joint venture pending consultation with the PRC investor.
- Citation
- BEATRICE TSANG SAU HING AND ANOTHER v. YEUNG MAN LOONG MAXLY AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Petitioner (director of Gold Pleasure): Beatrice Tsang Sau Hing; 2nd Petitioner (director of Gold Pleasure): Luana Tsang Sau Kuen; 1st Respondent: Yeung Man Loong Maxly; 2nd Respondent: Yeung Man Fung; 3rd Respondent: Lo Wai Yin; 4th Respondent: Yeung Tung Shing; 5th Respondent (company in Winding Up; Represented by Provisional Liquidators): Gold Pleasure Industrial Company Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2006
- Case Number
- HCCW49/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition Under Companies Ordinance (section 177(1)(f)) / Interlocutory Summons for Inspection After Appointment of Provisional Liquidators (chambers Hearing)
- Outcome
- Summons granted in part: inspection ordered for documents in Hong Kong; inspection of documents at PRC joint venture adjourned with liberty to restore.
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Right of Inspection, Provisional Liquidators' Powers, Document Inspection/discovery, Cross Border Document Access, Joint Venture Governance
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Beatrice Tsang Sau Hing
1st Petitioner (director of Gold Pleasure)
Luana Tsang Sau Kuen
2nd Petitioner (director of Gold Pleasure)
Yeung Man Loong Maxly
1st Respondent
Yeung Man Fung
2nd Respondent
Lo Wai Yin
3rd Respondent
Yeung Tung Shing
4th Respondent
Gold Pleasure Industrial Company Limited
5th Respondent (company in Winding Up; Represented by Provisional Liquidators)
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition Under Companies Ordinance (section 177(1)(f)) / Interlocutory Summons for Inspection After Appointment of Provisional Liquidators (chambers Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether directors retain a right of inspection of company documents after appointment of provisional liquidators
- 2 Whether provisional liquidators' possession of company documents is exclusive
- 3 Whether inspection should be permitted for documents held by a PRC joint venture outside the jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
Directors retain a right to inspect company documents after appointment of provisional liquidators provided such inspection does not impede the provisional liquidators in the proper discharge of their duties or prejudice the company; provisional liquidators' possession of documents is not exclusive; court will grant inspection of documents held in Hong Kong subject to confidentiality undertakings and costs, and will adjourn inspection of documents at the PRC joint venture pending consultation with the PRC investor.
Court Disposition
Summons granted in part: inspection ordered for documents in Hong Kong; inspection of documents at PRC joint venture adjourned with liberty to restore.
Orders
- Provisional liquidators to permit petitioners inspection of the documents listed in column 2 of the provisional liquidators' list (documents kept and available in Hong Kong)
- Petitioners to give an undertaking to use inspected documents only for the winding-up proceedings of the Hong Kong companies and to keep them confidential
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment