EL v. CFL

EL v. CFL

The court exercised its discretion to order disclosure only where the probative value outweighed prejudice and proportionality concerns: unredacted credit card statements from March 2009 to date were necessary to assess standard of living and were ordered produced subject to undertakings; requests for historical...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
EL v. CFL
Parties
Petitioner (wife): EL; Respondent (husband): CFL
Court
Family Court
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
9 August 2013
Case Number
FCMC4685/2012
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial Causes / Application for Specific Discovery (chambers Hearing and Judgment)
Outcome
Application partially granted and partially refused
Legal Topics
Disclosure, Specific Discovery, Ancillary Relief, Forensic Accounting, Confidentiality Objections, Proportionality
Source Language
en
Family Law Civil Procedure Evidence Law Financial Remedies Disclosure Specific Discovery Ancillary Relief Forensic Accounting +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

EL

Petitioner (wife)

CFL

Respondent (husband)

Procedural Posture

Matrimonial Causes / Application for Specific Discovery (chambers Hearing and Judgment)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Husband's financial disclosure is adequate and whether specific discovery of bank and credit card records is necessary
  2. 2 Whether employer confidentiality objections justify redaction of credit card statements
  3. 3 Appropriate temporal scope of disclosure prior to separation and petition

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to order disclosure only where the probative value outweighed prejudice and proportionality concerns: unredacted credit card statements from March 2009 to date were necessary to assess standard of living and were ordered produced subject to undertakings; requests for historical employer payment breakdowns, extended bank statements back to 2009, JP Morgan records to 2005 and the Wife's supplementary card statements were refused as unnecessary, disproportionate or evidential rather than producible, and confirmed there is no life insurance policy.

Court Disposition

Application partially granted and partially refused

Orders

  • Husband to produce unredacted credit card statements (including American Express Centurion) from March 2009 to date within 14 days subject to confidentiality undertakings
  • Request for explanation and production of REL receipts/payments relating to Singapore property refused