香港特別行政區 訴 周柏均及另一人
法院認為辯方所索之PGO/FPM章節及兩份內部調查報告與本案爭點無關或非必需披露;即使部分內容相關,政務司司長已發PII證書並提出充分理據,該等文件受公眾利益豁免保護;且在現有已披露的證人供詞下,被告不會因不披露該等文件而被剝奪公平審訊,故駁回披露申請並確認PII保護。
- Citation
- [2022] HKDC 1039
- Parties
- Prosecution: 香港特別行政區; First Defendant: 周柏均; Second Defendant: 胡子鍵
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 December 2021
- Case Number
- DCCC475/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Disclosure / Public Interest Immunity Application / Pre Trial Disclosure / PII Hearing (non Public)
- Outcome
- Defence disclosure application refused; requested documents withheld under public interest immunity; defence barred from eliciting or using those materials at trial.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure Obligations, Public Interest Immunity (pii), Use of Force / Police Manuals, Obstruction of Police, Pre Trial Procedure
- Source Language
- CH
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
香港特別行政區
Prosecution
周柏均
First Defendant
胡子鍵
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Disclosure / Public Interest Immunity Application / Pre Trial Disclosure / PII Hearing (non Public)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requested PGO and FPM chapters and internal police investigation reports are disclosable under the prosecution's common law disclosure duty
- 2 Whether the requested materials are protected by public interest immunity (class or contents)
- 3 Whether non-disclosure would deny the defendant a fair trial
Ratio Decidendi
法院認為辯方所索之PGO/FPM章節及兩份內部調查報告與本案爭點無關或非必需披露;即使部分內容相關,政務司司長已發PII證書並提出充分理據,該等文件受公眾利益豁免保護;且在現有已披露的證人供詞下,被告不會因不披露該等文件而被剝奪公平審訊,故駁回披露申請並確認PII保護。
Court Disposition
Defence disclosure application refused; requested documents withheld under public interest immunity; defence barred from eliciting or using those materials at trial.
Orders
- PGO及FPM第29章申請披露之章節與本案議題無關,毋須披露
- 兩份警方內部調查報告及辯方所索之PGO及FPM章節均獲公眾利益豁免(PII)保護
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment