MING SHIU CHUNG AND OTHERS v. MING SHIU SUM AND OTHERS
The Master granted leave to discontinue but ordered that the Plaintiffs bear the Defendants' costs on a party-and-party basis (to be taxed if not agreed) because the discontinuance did not make the proceedings academic, the Plaintiffs had not obtained the substantive relief sought on the central issue (the alleged fraud concerning the 10,000 shares), and the ordinary rule that costs follow the event applied under O.76 r.11 RHC.
- Citation
- MING SHIU CHUNG AND OTHERS v. MING SHIU SUM AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Ming Shiu Chung aka Hubert Ming; 2nd Plaintiff: Ming Shiu Tong; 3rd Plaintiff: Ming Shiu Hung aka Ronald Ming Siu Hung; 4th Plaintiff: Ming Shiu Kuen aka Bertha Shiu Kuen Shaw; 1st Defendant: Ming Shiu Sum aka Lawrence Ming Shui Sum; 2nd Defendant: Ming Shiu Wah aka Kennth Ming; 3rd Defendant: Ming Shiu Kow
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2006
- Case Number
- HCAP16/1996
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Action / Application for Leave to Discontinue and Costs Hearing
- Outcome
- Leave granted to Plaintiffs to discontinue the action; Plaintiffs ordered to pay Defendants' costs on a party-and-party basis, to be taxed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Discontinuance, Costs Orders, Letters of Administration, Authenticity of Documents, Grant of Probate
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ming Shiu Chung aka Hubert Ming
1st Plaintiff
Ming Shiu Tong
2nd Plaintiff
Ming Shiu Hung aka Ronald Ming Siu Hung
3rd Plaintiff
Ming Shiu Kuen aka Bertha Shiu Kuen Shaw
4th Plaintiff
Ming Shiu Sum aka Lawrence Ming Shui Sum
1st Defendant
Ming Shiu Wah aka Kennth Ming
2nd Defendant
Ming Shiu Kow
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate Action / Application for Leave to Discontinue and Costs Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiffs should be permitted to discontinue the probate action and on what terms
- 2 Whether costs of the defendants and the summons should be paid out of the estate
- 3 Whether the proceedings had become academic in light of parallel proceedings and earlier appellate outcomes
Ratio Decidendi
The Master granted leave to discontinue but ordered that the Plaintiffs bear the Defendants' costs on a party-and-party basis (to be taxed if not agreed) because the discontinuance did not make the proceedings academic, the Plaintiffs had not obtained the substantive relief sought on the central issue (the alleged fraud concerning the 10,000 shares), and the ordinary rule that costs follow the event applied under O.76 r.11 RHC.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to Plaintiffs to discontinue the action; Plaintiffs ordered to pay Defendants' costs on a party-and-party basis, to be taxed if not agreed.
Orders
- Leave granted to the Plaintiffs to discontinue the action herein.
- Costs of the Defendants in the present proceedings (apart from costs orders already reserved or made), including the summons filed on 28 September 2006 and the hearing on 10 November 2006, to be borne by the Plaintiffs on a party-and-party basis, to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment