CHENG CHEUNG WANG v. LO HOI YUNG AND OTHERS
The High Court properly exercised inherent jurisdiction and s.40 to transfer and deal with hybrid proceedings where it had jurisdiction over an account claim; interlocutory orders by the High Court suspending committee powers were valid until trial; the District Court has exclusive power to make final orders under s.31 but the transfer and ultimate District Court orders were valid; a firm may be appointed administrator as a "person"; proxy voting provisions did not invalidate the court-ordered meeting arrangements; accordingly the appeals are dismissed.
- Citation
- CHENG CHEUNG WANG v. LO HOI YUNG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff (representative): Cheng Cheung Wang (on behalf of self and co-owners of 47 flats in Han Palace Building); 1st Defendant (member of Management Committee): Lo Hoi Yung; 2nd Defendant (member of Management Committee): Peter Law; 3rd Defendant (member of Management Committee): Katherine Wong; 4th Defendant (member of Management Committee): Hong Pik Yiu; 5th Defendant (member of Management Committee): John Law; 6th Defendant (owner and Alleged Member of Management Committee): Wong Ching (Madam Wong); 7th Defendant (company Alleged Connected to 6th Defendant): Sam Wo Brothers Co. Ltd
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 1988
- Case Number
- CACV45/1986
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Final Judgment on Appeals (appeals Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed in their entirety
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Management Committee, Appointment of Administrator, Jurisdiction Between High Court and District Court, Transfer of Proceedings (s.40 District Court Ordinance), Proxy Voting and Meetings Under Deed/ordinance, Indemnity Costs, Representative Actions
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheng Cheung Wang (on behalf of self and co-owners of 47 flats in Han Palace Building)
Plaintiff (representative)
Lo Hoi Yung
1st Defendant (member of Management Committee)
Peter Law
2nd Defendant (member of Management Committee)
Katherine Wong
3rd Defendant (member of Management Committee)
Hong Pik Yiu
4th Defendant (member of Management Committee)
John Law
5th Defendant (member of Management Committee)
Wong Ching (Madam Wong)
6th Defendant (owner and Alleged Member of Management Committee)
Sam Wo Brothers Co. Ltd
7th Defendant (company Alleged Connected to 6th Defendant)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Final Judgment on Appeals (appeals Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 31 of the Multi-storey Buildings (Owners Incorporation) Ordinance confers exclusive jurisdiction on the District Court to dissolve a Management Committee and appoint an administrator and the effect on High Court interlocutory powers
- 2 Whether the High Court could properly transfer parts of the proceedings to the District Court under its inherent jurisdiction and s.40 of the District Court Ordinance
- 3 Whether a firm (Collier Petty) could be validly appointed as an administrator as a "person" under the Ordinance
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court properly exercised inherent jurisdiction and s.40 to transfer and deal with hybrid proceedings where it had jurisdiction over an account claim; interlocutory orders by the High Court suspending committee powers were valid until trial; the District Court has exclusive power to make final orders under s.31 but the transfer and ultimate District Court orders were valid; a firm may be appointed administrator as a "person"; proxy voting provisions did not invalidate the court-ordered meeting arrangements; accordingly the appeals are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed in their entirety
Orders
- Management Committee of Han Palace Building dissolved as from 23 November 1984
- Collier Petty appointed Administrator as from 23 November 1984 and Collier Petty Limited substituted on incorporation; appointment to run until 31 December 1987 or further order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment