LAM FONG AND OTHERS v. SO HOO YUEN t/a WUI LOONG SCAFOLD & MATCHED BUILDERS AND OTHERS
1st defendant breached duty by failing to provide sufficient safety belts and by failing to instruct workers to use them; that breach caused the deceased's death although the deceased was 15% contributorily negligent for not wearing a belt; 1st defendant liable for 85% of damages; 2nd defendant not liable.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- LAM FONG AND OTHERS v. SO HOO YUEN t/a WUI LOONG SCAFOLD & MATCHED BUILDERS AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Lam Fong and Ho Kok Keong, administrators of the estate of Mak Kuen Wan; 1st Defendant: So Hoo Yuen trading as Wui Loong Scafold & Matched Builders; 2nd Defendant: Cheung Wing Wing and Keung Hok Ming trading as Shanghai Wing Sun Paints Work & Decoration; Third Party: The Incorporated Owner of Dragon View Court; Fourth Party: Taikoo Royal Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 June 1990
- Case Number
- HCA7572/1984
- Procedural Posture
- Negligence (fatal Workplace Accident) / Judgment (trial Concluded)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs against 1st defendant; claim against 2nd defendant dismissed; apportionment 1st defendant 85% liable, deceased 15% contributory negligence.
- Legal Topics
- Employer Duty of Care, Contributory Negligence, Vicarious Liability, Safety Equipment, Damages, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lam Fong and Ho Kok Keong, administrators of the estate of Mak Kuen Wan
Plaintiffs
So Hoo Yuen trading as Wui Loong Scafold & Matched Builders
1st Defendant
Cheung Wing Wing and Keung Hok Ming trading as Shanghai Wing Sun Paints Work & Decoration
2nd Defendant
The Incorporated Owner of Dragon View Court
Third Party
Taikoo Royal Insurance Company Limited
Fourth Party
Procedural Posture
Negligence (fatal Workplace Accident) / Judgment (trial Concluded)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st defendant breached duty by failing to provide adequate safety belts and instructions
- 2 Whether the deceased was contributorily negligent for not wearing a safety belt
- 3 Whether the 2nd defendant (painting contractor) bore liability
Ratio Decidendi
1st defendant breached duty by failing to provide sufficient safety belts and by failing to instruct workers to use them; that breach caused the deceased's death although the deceased was 15% contributorily negligent for not wearing a belt; 1st defendant liable for 85% of damages; 2nd defendant not liable.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs against 1st defendant; claim against 2nd defendant dismissed; apportionment 1st defendant 85% liable, deceased 15% contributory negligence.
Orders
- Judgment for plaintiffs against 1st defendant subject to 15% reduction for contributory negligence
- Plaintiffs awarded damages and interest as per agreement: funeral expenses $4,545.00 with 5% p.a. pre-judgment interest from date of accident; $30,000.00 for loss of expectation of life with 2% p.a. interest from service of writ; $217,106.00 pre-trial lost years award with 5% p.a. interest from date of accident...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment