CHOW CHI YIM(周志炎)by WONG YUN HO(黃潤好)his wife and next friend 對 李贊寶及另二人
Applying the multi-factor test and witness credibility assessments the court found on the balance of probabilities the deceased was an employee working on daily wages under the direction and with tools provided by the First Respondent; the First Respondent was the deceased's employer and the Second Respondent was the main contractor and therefore also liable under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance. The Form 9 assessment (100% permanent loss; 36 months sick leave) was accepted as evidence. The court fixed the deceased's pre-accident average monthly working days at 13 days (daily wage HK$1,000) and awarded statutory compensation calculated under ss7,10,10A and 8, totalling HK$1,526,694,...
- Citation
- [2019] HKDC 1496
- Parties
- Applicant (deceased) Represented by Next Friend/wife Wong Yun Ho: CHOW CHI YIM; First Respondent: LEE CHAN PO; Second Respondent: TAM WAI CHAK; Third Respondent: EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ASSISTANCE FUND BOARD
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2019
- Case Number
- DCEC2737/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employees' Compensation Claim / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Applicant (as representative of the deceased's estate) succeeds. First and Second Respondents held jointly liable for the deceased's work injury and ordered to pay statutory compensation and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Employer Liability, Contractor V Subcontractor Liability, Statutory Compensation Calculation, Evidence (form 9), Costs Allocation
- Source Language
- CH
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHOW CHI YIM
Applicant (deceased) Represented by Next Friend/wife Wong Yun Ho
LEE CHAN PO
First Respondent
TAM WAI CHAK
Second Respondent
EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ASSISTANCE FUND BOARD
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employees' Compensation Claim / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased was an employee at the time of the accident
- 2 Whether First Respondent was the deceased's employer
- 3 Whether Second Respondent was the main contractor and therefore liable as principal contractor
Ratio Decidendi
Applying the multi-factor test and witness credibility assessments the court found on the balance of probabilities the deceased was an employee working on daily wages under the direction and with tools provided by the First Respondent; the First Respondent was the deceased's employer and the Second Respondent was the main contractor and therefore also liable under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance. The Form 9 assessment (100% permanent loss; 36 months sick leave) was accepted as evidence. The court fixed the deceased's pre-accident average monthly working days at 13 days (daily wage HK$1,000) and awarded statutory compensation calculated under ss7,10,10A and 8, totalling HK$1,526,694,...
Court Disposition
Applicant (as representative of the deceased's estate) succeeds. First and Second Respondents held jointly liable for the deceased's work injury and ordered to pay statutory compensation and costs.
Orders
- First Respondent liable for the deceased's injury under Employees' Compensation Ordinance s5
- Second Respondent liable as principal contractor under Employees' Compensation Ordinance s24
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment