MAXWELL ENGINEERING CO. LTD. v. CHUNG FAI ENGINEERING CO. (a firm)

MAXWELL ENGINEERING CO. LTD. v. CHUNG FAI ENGINEERING CO. (a firm)

The Master’s order compelling the directors to supply accounts of Chung Fai Engineering Company Limited was set aside because those accounts belong to a distinct corporate entity (Chung Fai Engineering Company Limited), not to the individual directors or the judgment debtor, and therefore the directors could not be ordered to produce them under the circumstances.

Citation
MAXWELL ENGINEERING CO. LTD. v. CHUNG FAI ENGINEERING CO. (a firm)
Parties
Judgment Debtor: Chung Fai Engineering Company (a firm); Judgment Creditor: Maxwell Engineering Company Limited
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
16 March 2001
Case Number
HCA10631/1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Enforcement / Judgment Creditor Examination / Interlocutory Appeal From Master's Order in Chambers
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Examination of Judgment Debtor, Production of Documents by Directors, Separate Legal Personality, Discovery Against Non Parties
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chung Fai Engineering Company (a firm)

Judgment Debtor

Maxwell Engineering Company Limited

Judgment Creditor

Procedural Posture

Civil Enforcement / Judgment Creditor Examination / Interlocutory Appeal From Master's Order in Chambers

  1. 1 Whether directors can be ordered to produce documents belonging to a separate corporate entity
  2. 2 Whether discovery or production may be compelled from a non-party to the proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The Master’s order compelling the directors to supply accounts of Chung Fai Engineering Company Limited was set aside because those accounts belong to a distinct corporate entity (Chung Fai Engineering Company Limited), not to the individual directors or the judgment debtor, and therefore the directors could not be ordered to produce them under the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Paragraph 2(c) of Master Mary Yuen's order dated 19 January 2001 is set aside