YUNG SIU CHEE MARGARET AND OTHERS v. CHOY CHING WA FIONNE AND OTHERS
The court held that substantial weight must be given to the testator's express provision for remuneration in the will; the executrices failed to discharge the onus of showing the will's fixed remuneration was inadequate or that special circumstances existed. Consequently the court would not exercise its discretion to grant additional remuneration to Fionne Choy beyond the amount provided in the will. Further, because the executrices did not produce pre-litigation advice or disclose strengths and weaknesses, the court would not have authorized the PRC proceedings and would not allow their costs to be borne by the estate.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1767
- Parties
- Executrix: Fionne Choy (Choy Ching Wa Fionne); Co Executrices of the Estate: The four co-executrices; Defendant in PRC Proceedings: Billy Yung; Estate/subject of Proceedings: Estate of Yung Yau; Beneficiaries: Beneficiaries (unnamed in excerpt)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2019
- Case Number
- HCMP1682/2016
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Miscellaneous Probate/directions Proceedings / Directions/substantive Hearing to Determine Executor Remuneration, Removal and Litigation Authorisation Issues
- Outcome
- Court refused to allow additional remuneration to Fionne Choy beyond the sum fixed in the will; court indicated it would not allow costs of the PRC proceedings to be paid from the estate on the material before it; other contested issues to be addressed at substantive hearing (including cross-examination on NY Loan)
- Legal Topics
- Executor Remuneration, Removal of Executors, Beddoe/leave to Litigate, Recovery of Litigation Costs From Estate, Duty to Render Accounts, Cross Examination in Probate Disputes
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fionne Choy (Choy Ching Wa Fionne)
Executrix
The four co-executrices
Co Executrices of the Estate
Billy Yung
Defendant in PRC Proceedings
Estate of Yung Yau
Estate/subject of Proceedings
Beneficiaries (unnamed in excerpt)
Beneficiaries
Procedural Posture
High Court Miscellaneous Probate/directions Proceedings / Directions/substantive Hearing to Determine Executor Remuneration, Removal and Litigation Authorisation Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Fionne Choy is entitled to additional remuneration (HK$50,000 per year or otherwise) beyond the amount fixed in the will
- 2 Whether the four executrices should be removed
- 3 Whether costs of PRC proceedings commenced by the executrices may be paid out of the estate
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that substantial weight must be given to the testator's express provision for remuneration in the will; the executrices failed to discharge the onus of showing the will's fixed remuneration was inadequate or that special circumstances existed. Consequently the court would not exercise its discretion to grant additional remuneration to Fionne Choy beyond the amount provided in the will. Further, because the executrices did not produce pre-litigation advice or disclose strengths and weaknesses, the court would not have authorized the PRC proceedings and would not allow their costs to be borne by the estate.
Court Disposition
Court refused to allow additional remuneration to Fionne Choy beyond the sum fixed in the will; court indicated it would not allow costs of the PRC proceedings to be paid from the estate on the material before it; other contested issues to be addressed at substantive hearing (including cross-examination on NY Loan)
Orders
- Declined to exercise discretion to award additional remuneration to Fionne Choy beyond the will
- Costs of the PRC proceedings will not be allowed out of the estate on the material before the court (no Beddoe authorization)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment