PAUL KI PING KI AND ANOTEHR v. ORIENTAL DAILY PUBLISHER LTD. AND OTHERS
The judge exercised discretion to strike out the 1st Plaintiff's personal claim as duplicative, dismissed the action against the 6th Defendant with indemnity costs because the claim against her was unreasonable/malicious and unsupported by the evidence, and applied the principle that where only nominal damages are awarded the usual practice is no order as to costs between the parties, additionally ordering the Plaintiff to bear jury expenses.
- Citation
- PAUL KI PING KI AND ANOTEHR v. ORIENTAL DAILY PUBLISHER LTD. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Paul Ki Ping Ki; 2nd Plaintiff: Paul Ki Ping Ki trading as Hong Kong Washington Company; 1st Defendant: Oriental Daily Publisher Limited; 2nd Defendant: Ho Sai Kan; 3rd Defendant: Chan Wai Keung, Terence; 4th Defendant: Cheng Wah Kwan, Betty; 5th Defendant: Leung Chi Shing; 6th Defendant: Cua King Shuen, Serina
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 1999
- Case Number
- HCA9748/1995
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Ruling at Trial
- Outcome
- 1st Plaintiff's personal claim struck out; action against 6th Defendant dismissed; 2nd Plaintiff awarded nominal damages ($1) against 1st-4th Defendants; costs orders made as to indemnity and jury expenses.
- Legal Topics
- Fair Comment, Nominal Damages, Costs Orders and Indemnity Costs, Jury Trial Procedure, Striking Out Duplicative Claims
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Ki Ping Ki
1st Plaintiff
Paul Ki Ping Ki trading as Hong Kong Washington Company
2nd Plaintiff
Oriental Daily Publisher Limited
1st Defendant
Ho Sai Kan
2nd Defendant
Chan Wai Keung, Terence
3rd Defendant
Cheng Wah Kwan, Betty
4th Defendant
Leung Chi Shing
5th Defendant
Cua King Shuen, Serina
6th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Ruling at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st Plaintiff's personal claim was duplicative and should be struck out
- 2 Whether the 6th Defendant should be dismissed and ordered indemnity costs because the claim was unreasonable/malicious
- 3 Whether a successful plaintiff awarded only nominal damages should be awarded costs
Ratio Decidendi
The judge exercised discretion to strike out the 1st Plaintiff's personal claim as duplicative, dismissed the action against the 6th Defendant with indemnity costs because the claim against her was unreasonable/malicious and unsupported by the evidence, and applied the principle that where only nominal damages are awarded the usual practice is no order as to costs between the parties, additionally ordering the Plaintiff to bear jury expenses.
Court Disposition
1st Plaintiff's personal claim struck out; action against 6th Defendant dismissed; 2nd Plaintiff awarded nominal damages ($1) against 1st-4th Defendants; costs orders made as to indemnity and jury expenses.
Orders
- Strike out 1st Plaintiff's claim with costs on an indemnity basis
- Dismiss the Plaintiff's action against the 6th Defendant with costs on an indemnity basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment