HKSAR v. LUO SHUISHENG

HKSAR v. LUO SHUISHENG

The appeal was dismissed: the court endorsed the magistrate's application of an 18‑month starting point for the false 2‑way re‑entry permit charges reduced by one‑third for guilty pleas to 12 months on Charges 1 and 2, and a 9‑week starting point reduced to 6 weeks on Charge 3, with the 6 weeks ordered to run consecutively to the concurrent 12‑month sentences; family background did not materially mitigate the immigration offences and deterrent sentencing was appropriate.

Citation
HKSAR v. LUO SHUISHENG
Parties
Respondent (prosecution): HKSAR; Appellant (accused): LUO SHUISHENG
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
18 May 2007
Case Number
HCMA327/2007
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal HCMA 327/2007 (on Appeal From STCC 1978/2007) / Determination of Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
False Representation, Breach of Condition of Stay, Totality Principle, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Plea Discount, Deterrence
Source Language
EN
Criminal Law Immigration Law Sentencing False Representation Breach of Condition of Stay Totality Principle Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences Plea Discount +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent (prosecution)

LUO SHUISHENG

Appellant (accused)

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal HCMA 327/2007 (on Appeal From STCC 1978/2007) / Determination of Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence was excessive
  2. 2 Proper application of the totality principle
  3. 3 Appropriate starting point for offences involving a false 2-way re-entry permit

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed: the court endorsed the magistrate's application of an 18‑month starting point for the false 2‑way re‑entry permit charges reduced by one‑third for guilty pleas to 12 months on Charges 1 and 2, and a 9‑week starting point reduced to 6 weeks on Charge 3, with the 6 weeks ordered to run consecutively to the concurrent 12‑month sentences; family background did not materially mitigate the immigration offences and deterrent sentencing was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Sentence of 12 months imprisonment on Charges 1 and 2 (reduced from 18 months for guilty plea) affirmed