HKSAR v. LO HUNG KWONG

HKSAR v. LO HUNG KWONG

Court held that the seven primary facts identified by the judge, taken together and supported by the handwriting expert's finding of probable authorship and the proximate cash withdrawals, were capable of producing the only irresistible inference of guilt beyond reasonable doubt; reliance on the handwriting expert as part of cumulative circumstantial evidence was permissible; leave to appeal was dismissed.

Citation
HKSAR v. LO HUNG KWONG
Parties
Applicant/appellant: Lo Hung Kwong; Respondent (prosecution): The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
22 June 2000
Case Number
CACC525/1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction (on Appeal From DCCC No. 378 of 1999); Sentence Appeal Abandoned
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal against conviction dismissed; convictions upheld
Legal Topics
Forgery, Circumstantial Evidence, Handwriting Expert Opinion, Burden of Proof, Leave to Appeal, Sentencing
Source Language
EN
Criminal Law Evidence Forgery Circumstantial Evidence Handwriting Expert Opinion Burden of Proof Leave to Appeal Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 13
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lo Hung Kwong

Applicant/appellant

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

Respondent (prosecution)

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction (on Appeal From DCCC No. 378 of 1999); Sentence Appeal Abandoned

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether circumstantial evidence established guilt beyond reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Whether handwriting expert opinion could be treated as a primary fact for inference
  3. 3 Whether the judge made unjustified factual assumptions (residence) affecting verdict

Ratio Decidendi

Court held that the seven primary facts identified by the judge, taken together and supported by the handwriting expert's finding of probable authorship and the proximate cash withdrawals, were capable of producing the only irresistible inference of guilt beyond reasonable doubt; reliance on the handwriting expert as part of cumulative circumstantial evidence was permissible; leave to appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal against conviction dismissed; convictions upheld

Orders

  • Leave to appeal against conviction refused and convictions affirmed
  • Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed upon abandonment