GAIN PARK HOLDINGS LTD AND ANOTHER v. EVERSINO INVESTMENTS LTD AND OTHERS
Plaintiffs failed to show Hong Kong was clearly the appropriate forum; the central factual issues (alleged detention, coercion and notarial acts) arose and are to be resolved in the PRC where witnesses and state authorities reside and where related proceedings are pending, therefore the Master’s order granting leave to serve out of jurisdiction is set aside and the Hong Kong action is stayed in favour of the PRC court.
- Citation
- GAIN PARK HOLDINGS LTD AND ANOTHER v. EVERSINO INVESTMENTS LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Gain Park Holdings Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Shum Man Fu (also known as Shen Wenfu); 1st Defendant: Eversino Investments Limited; 2nd Defendant: Shagang Group (Hong Kong) Holdings Limited; 3rd Defendant: Shagang Shipping Company Limited; 4th Defendant: Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co. Limited; 5th Defendant: Shagang International (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd; 6th Defendant: Shagang Group (Hong Kong) Holdings Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2014
- Case Number
- HCA1638/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Commercial/company/share Transfer Dispute / Interim Applications: Setting Aside Leave to Serve Out of Jurisdiction and Stay Application on Forum Non Conveniens Grounds
- Outcome
- Master H Au Yeung’s order dated 29 October 2013 granting leave to serve out of jurisdiction set aside; proceedings in Hong Kong stayed in favour of the PRC court as the distinctly more appropriate forum; costs ordered nisi against plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Forum Non Conveniens, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Duress, Undue Influence, Non Est Factum, Share Transfer, Rescission, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gain Park Holdings Limited
1st Plaintiff
Shum Man Fu (also known as Shen Wenfu)
2nd Plaintiff
Eversino Investments Limited
1st Defendant
Shagang Group (Hong Kong) Holdings Limited
2nd Defendant
Shagang Shipping Company Limited
3rd Defendant
Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co. Limited
4th Defendant
Shagang International (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd
5th Defendant
Shagang Group (Hong Kong) Holdings Limited
6th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Commercial/company/share Transfer Dispute / Interim Applications: Setting Aside Leave to Serve Out of Jurisdiction and Stay Application on Forum Non Conveniens Grounds
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer documents were signed involuntarily under duress/coercion or invalid by non est factum or undue influence
- 2 Whether the Hong Kong court is the appropriate forum or whether the PRC court is clearly more appropriate (forum non conveniens)
- 3 Whether leave to serve the writ out of jurisdiction should be set aside under Order 12 r 8/Order 11 r 1
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs failed to show Hong Kong was clearly the appropriate forum; the central factual issues (alleged detention, coercion and notarial acts) arose and are to be resolved in the PRC where witnesses and state authorities reside and where related proceedings are pending, therefore the Master’s order granting leave to serve out of jurisdiction is set aside and the Hong Kong action is stayed in favour of the PRC court.
Court Disposition
Master H Au Yeung’s order dated 29 October 2013 granting leave to serve out of jurisdiction set aside; proceedings in Hong Kong stayed in favour of the PRC court as the distinctly more appropriate forum; costs ordered nisi against plaintiffs
Orders
- Set aside the order of Master H Au Yeung dated 29 October 2013 giving leave to serve the Concurrent Writ of Summons out of jurisdiction
- Stay the Hong Kong proceedings in favour of the PRC court as being the distinctly more appropriate forum
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment